Every army marches into battle thinking so.  Or at least hopes so, though sources tell me The Grand Master of All doesn’t pick sides.

Regardless, it’s human nature to believe that our cause is just, our belief is right, our way is the true way.

Take, for example, the Islanders-Penguins tilt on Friday evening.

There was a buzz before this matchup on the Island that didn’t have much to do with the respective talents of the two teams.

It had to do with the Dancing Bear side of the old shinny game.

How would the Islanders respond to slights, real and imagined, delivered their way by the Penguins the last time these two teams butted heads?

Penguins TV included the Brent Johnson-Rick DiPietro one-punch fight in its opening segment; the Islanders telecast also focused on it.

Hey, it was the main story line.  It would become The Main Event.

After building up an insurmountable 6-0 lead, the Islanders saw fit to exact some revenge for the laundry list of grudges they carried around with them.

About halfway through the second period, Matt Martin decided to go all Todd Bertuzzi on Maxime Talbot, and attacked the Penguin forward without provocation.

Well, that depends on what television broadcast you were glued to.

Thanks to Gamecentre on the NHL.com website, one can go back and view the events through the eyes of the Islanders, and then the Penguins broadcast crews.

Penguins  – Paul Steigerwald & Bob Errey

Islanders – Howie Rose & Butch Goring

From the Islanders viewpoint, Martin’s hit was payback for the pound of flesh Talbot exacted in the last game.  Rose and Goring applauded Martin for acting upon the age-old hockey truism of “taking a number”.

They lauded Martin for choosing the appropriate time to get back at Talbot.  A 6-0 lead for the Good Guys (C) was the perfect time, because the resulting instigator penalty probably would not hurt the Islanders.

Flip the broadcast over to the Penguins side of the battle, and things looked quite different.

To the Pittsburgh TV guys, there is no place in the game for what Martin did.

Or at least face Talbot when you attack him.

And in the third period, when Mr. Bridgeport, Micheal Haley, found it necessary to get back at Brent Johnson for his one punch knockout of Rick DiPietro, the Human Injury Machine, (even though DiPietro WANTED to fight), Eric Godard jumped off the bench to come to his goaltender’s rescue.  A big no-no, though he’ll be a hockey hero in the Pittsburgh dressing room for his mad dash.

Both the Islanders and the Penguins broadcasters shared similar sentiments about that one.

Rightfully so, Godard was slapped with a 10-game suspension.  Hopefully the league makes him serve the entire sentence.

Just before that happened, Howie Rose quickly apologized for initially saying that Eric Tangradi “turtled” when Trevor Gillies went at him. 

Tangradi appeared hurt on the hit from Gillies, who showed his worth to Mankind by dropping his gloves and banging away at the injured Tangradi, who was certainly not turtling.

For his contribution to the great game of hockey, Gillies was suspended for nine games.  Martin got four games for his earlier sucker punch on Talbot.  Not that these suspensions will hurt the Islanders all that much; how much of an NHL future did a player like Gillies have anyhow?

What does hurt is a significant monetary fine.

The Islanders were fined $100,000 for their inability to control their dogs.  Geesh, that’s about three games worth of gate receipts for the team.

By the time another gathering of the clan happened near the end of the third period, the arena crew were playing “Rough Boys” by Pete Townshend, a song released in 1980.  Which was a great season for the Philadelphia Flyers.  A fitting choice.

What a shame Matt Cooke missed all the fun.

The Islanders’ TV crew were almost boastful about how the Islanders went after Talbot. 

Know your audience.  They did.

For the most part, Rose and Goring sounded like they were enjoying the freak show, continually pointing out that the crowd was eating this stuff up, though they later admitted things were getting “silly” when the fighting persisted with mere minutes remaining in the game.

Butch Goring went on about how the Islanders will grow as a team because of the events  in that game.  Sadly, he’s probably correct.

Steigerwald and Errey kept saying “this is ridiculous”, and asking “when is enough enough”?

Any guess which of these teams is playing better hockey this season?  Which team fills its arena by playing actual hockey?

Without much doubt, if you substitute any two NHL teams for the Islanders, and Penguins, and have a similar scenario unfold, the TV broadcasters (and radio…and print media…and bloggers, especially bloggers) would interpret event according to their home-team bias.

It’s rare when a home broadcaster calls a game as objectively as possible.  After all, they understand they are mostly broadcasting to fans of the home team.  Not all that long ago, before the widespread use of the internet, and services such as NHL Centre Ice, only the home fans saw the home TV broadcast.

It was different for terrestrial radio, if you were lucky and the signals were clear that night.

Back in early 1985, a friend and I spent a pleasant clear winter night in Ottawa listening to Dick Irvin Jr. do a broadcast of the Montreal Canadiens in Landover, taking on the Washington Capitals.

The Habs games were carried on CKBY, the local FM country station.

Using a second radio, we chanced upon the Washington broadcast of the game.  For the most part, the signal from down South was consistent.

It was fascinating to compare and contrast the two calls.

While deeply immersed in the Canadiens’ culture for decades, Irvin was an old pro who had earned more than enough respect that he could call out Montreal when they didn’t play well, or when they got lucky, or when they got away with something.  His relative lack-of-bias must have had something to do with the fact his Hockey Hall-of-Fame father used to coach the Maple Leafs, and Black Hawks.

On the other hand, the radio play-by-play voice for the Capitals was all Caps.  He knew his constituency.  They were, generally speaking, probably relatively new to the game, and probably were Caps fans first, then hockey fans.

The Capitals could do no wrong, and when they did, it was invariably the fault of the officials.

Of course, cheering for Montreal, I heard things differently than others, but my friend, a die-hard Boston Bruins fans, in no hurry to find common ground with a Habs fan, agreed with my take on things.

I recall Washington won the game.  They often did after the Rod Langway trade earlier that decade.

A quick look at flyershistory.com reveals that the Capitals and Canadiens met in Montreal on December 20^th, 1984, and that one ended in a 2-2 tie.

Was that the game we listened to?

It seems more likely we listened to the back end of a home-and-home series in late March.

On March 21^st, the home town Canadiens downed Washington 3-2.

A night later, the home town Capitals returned the favour, beating Montreal 3-1, and yes, Rod Langway scored what proved to be the winning goal.

There were ten major penalties handed out in the game, five to each side.

Yup, this had to have been the game.  Soetart against Jensen.

Would love to see the video for that one, after all these years.

To see what really happened.

 - Mick Kern