Mick Kern appears courtesy of Live From Wayne Gretzky’s
When is the game in-the-bag? If a team is ahead by a country mile even before the Hot Stove League have had a chance to pontificate, when is enough enough?
Here’s the thing. Either you’re going to be accused of piling on if you keep applying the pressure, or you let up and risk allowing a team to score a couple. If you’re up by five goals as the third period begins, the odds are the two points are yours. But what if???
Don’t we always hear that the good teams possess the killer instinct; the unblinking ability to put the boot to the throat, making sure that your opponent doesn’t get back up? Finish the job. Championship calibre teams can do that. So, what’s with this notion of taking the foot off the gas?
In football, if you’re got a sizeable lead, you can always get your first-string quarterback out of there, not to mention your marquee running back. Baseball’s a bit different, as you can’t substitute back in guys once they’ve been yanked. Nonetheless, a team sporting a big lead will often take out their star players late in the game, unless they’re gunning for some specific milestone or accomplishment.
So what about hockey? Its ebb-and-flow is unique in the world of sports. Even with a rather sizeable lead, a change-in-momentum means a game isn’t really out-of-reach until that final buzzer sounds. And there are many examples of teams doing exactly that – teams coming all the way back from seemingly unsurmountable deficits.
Ask any Los Angeles Kings’ fan about the Miracle on Manchester back during the 1982 playoffs. Better yet, ask any Edmonton Oilers’ fan about the Miracle on Manchester back during the 1982 playoffs.
The St. Louis Blues did it a number of seasons ago while on the road against the Toronto Maple Leafs, scoring a bushel of goals and stealing a win away from the home team. Last season, the New York Rangers saw a 5-0 lead slip away against the Montreal Canadiens, and the hometown Habs stormed back to win 6-5, the arena going nuts in the greatest single-game comeback in the Canadiens’ long, storied history.
Did the Leafs and Rangers take their foot off the gas? Did they relax, even if subconsciously? When the Rangers were nursing their five-goal lead, most observers would probably had declared that game, for all intent-and-purposes, over. Time to head for the exits and beat the traffic, which was my father’s favourite thing to do at all sporting events we ever attended together.
But that’s what makes sports worth watching in the first place; no matter how much one handicaps a game, no matter how stacked one lineup appears against the other, until the puck is dropped, no-one knows for sure how things will turn it. This isn’t professional wrestling. This is sports. The original reality T.V.
Which makes it all the more curious that former NHL’er and veteran CBC broadcaster Craig Simpson mused out loud this past Saturday night that he found it interesting that Canadiens’ head coach Guy Carbonneau wasn’t taking his foot off the gas, as the two teams entered the third period with Montreal leading Toronto 6-1.
The Maple Leafs ended up changing their goaltender for the final frame, going with crowd favourite Curtis Joseph, who was donning the blue-and-white for the first time in a regular-season game since returning to the team this past off-season…and early on he stops a breakaway opportunity. Despite having been outplayed for the majority of the game, the Leafs had a goal wiped out, and hit a couple of posts behind Jaroslav Halak.
Hey, this is hockey. A couple of inches here-and-there, and the hometeam are suddenly back in a game they have no business being in. No doubt the faithful would have been whipped into a frenzy, and before you know it, a 6-3 deficit doesn’t look so insurmountable.
That’s one reason why a team should never take it’s foot off the gas. Goals are still at a premium in this league; get them when you can.
Another reason; one of the truism’s of sports is never let up. That’s when injuries can occur. The hockey community trots this line out all the time.
Yet another reason; once a team has a something akin to a 6-1 lead, any extra goals scored don’t mean all that much in the context of that particular game, but come the end of the season, those bonus goals could be huge. Could decide a playoff ranking, could mean a personal bonus for a player, could win someone a scoring championship.
And another reason: the people who pay the freight, the fans, both in attendence and watching at home. Keep the game exciting – don’t just go through the motions. Oh, naturally, it won’t be as intense when one team has a 6-1 lead after two periods (unless it gets chippy), but just mailing it in for 20 minutes shouldn’t cut it with anyone.
Okay, but what about arguments why a team should let up somewhat? What about long memories? Despite the fact I’m in general agreement with The Professor, Sean Avery, that most NHL players are simple (most athletes, for that matter), one attribute professional hockey players can brag about having are long memories.
You continue to pile up the goals late in a game, chances are good you’ll hear from that same beleagured squad when you next meet.
But so what? That’s part of what makes hockey so great. The on-going feuds. This isn’t house league, where everyone gets a trophy. This is the National Hockey League, thee best league in the world. Nothing is given to you. You have to earn it.
So, instead of whining that a team with a 6-1 lead continues to try to fill your net, make them stop. Play to win that third period. Hockey folk always go on about trite stuff like that. Well, then just do it. Take control of your own destiny. And after all that, you’re still getting your butt kicked, then it’s time to look skyward to the press box, like all those annoying TV shots, and direct your gaze at the team’s GM, stoically watching the proceedings unfold. Blame him if you must, not the team that’s skating circles around you.
I’m not advocating what happened a few years ago in the NFL. One team refused to field their players on an extra-point attempt, so the team kicking for that extra point instead walked it into the undefended end-zone for two points.
Which served the protesting team right for pulling a sulk prank my four-year-old has perfected. Which was also great, watching a continent of bettors go absolutely bananas because their precious point-spread was compromised.
Okay, come to think of it, I was all for that.
Really though, if I were that team (was it the Patriots?), I would have just kicked a single point, just to show that I was classier than your team, who removed themselves from the field in the first place…unless I really needed that second point, which at that point, I would have said merci beaucoup, and walked in.
But there would have been no dancing.
The bottom line is, the game isn’t over until the final buzzer goes…and when there’s no chance of a time-consuming replay.
The sole responsibility of preventing a team from scoring a ton of goals rests with the other team. Not the team looking to hit double-digits.
There is no proper time to take the foot off the gas. This is the big leagues. No coasting. Leave that for the office softball game.
- Mick Kern
Mick Kern appears courtesy of Live From Wayne Gretzky’s