<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gretzky.com &#187; Live From Wayne Gretzky&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gretzky.com/blog/category/live-from-wayne-gretzkys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gretzky.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:03:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Golden State Warriors</title>
		<link>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2011/04/golden-state-warriors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2011/04/golden-state-warriors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 23:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Live From Wayne Gretzky's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 NHL Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 Stanley Cup Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anaheim ducks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freeway Faceoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kings versus Ducks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kings versus Sharks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Sweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san jose sharks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gretzky.com/blog/?p=1057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steady yourself for an onslaught of Golden State clichés.  The song California Dreamin’ will be front-and-centre.  You can pretty much count on Hockey Night in Canada to air that one over a montage of hockey highlights. How about Come to California by Matthew Sweet?  That’s what the NHL Playoffs are doing this spring, as for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steady yourself for an onslaught of Golden State clichés. </p>
<p>The song <em>California Dreamin’ </em>will be front-and-centre.  You can pretty much count on Hockey Night in Canada to air that one over a montage of hockey highlights.</p>
<p>How about <em>Come to California</em> by Matthew Sweet?  That’s what the NHL Playoffs are doing this spring, as for the first time all three California-based NHL franchises are headed to the post-season.</p>
<p>That’s one more team than the entire country of Canada is sending, though the population of California is over 37 million, about three million more people than the entire Motherland of Hockey (C).   Maybe the NHL should move the Coyotes to San Diego, and the Thrashers to Fresno .</p>
<p>The Anaheim Ducks have enjoyed the most playoff success recently, having carved their name on the Stanley Cup only four seasons ago, while the Los Angeles Kings haven’t had the pleasure yet, only making the Final way back in 1993, when Kurt Cobain was still alive, OJ was just an ex-football player, and Wayne Gretzky was a young monarch.</p>
<p>The San Jose Sharks were born out of a divorce in Minneapolis-St. Paul, and for two decades plus they’ve been even less successful in the playoffs than the Kings.  The Sharks are one of the few NHL teams never to have placed a skate on Final ice.</p>
<p>This year, the Ducks are a trendy pick to do some damage in the playoffs, but that may all hinge on the health of their goaltending.  The Comeback Kid, Ray Emery, is always and forever one bad bump away from a lower body injury.</p>
<p>The Sharks may finally be off everyone’s expectation radar, after seasons of coming up small in the post-season.  General Manager Doug Wilson has copied the Stand Pat routine pioneered by famed baseball GM Pat Gillick, when he ran the Toronto Blue Jays in the late 80’s.  Gillick put together a number of talented teams during his watch, and was reluctant to make changes just for the sake of change, even when the Jays came up short time and time again in late September.</p>
<p>Then again, Gillick only won the Big One in baseball when he finally deviated from that plan, and made a big splash one off-season, trading a couple of star players (Fred McGriff and Tony Fernandez) to the San Diego Padres for Joe Carter and Roberto Alomar.</p>
<p>Alomar joins Gillick in the Baseball Hall-of-Game this July.</p>
<p>Wilson should probably be in the hockey equivalent for his stellar work patrolling the blue line for the Chicago Black Hawks during the 1980’s.  He may get there yet, rewarded for his managerial skills, a resume that will only be taken seriously if he can add at least one Stanley Cup to the masthead.</p>
<p>The California Dreamin’ part, of course, really kicks in if two of these teams meet up in the playoffs.  Particularly the Kings and Ducks.  That could still come to pass, but the first round will feature the Sharks against the Kings.</p>
<p>When it comes to regional rivalries, hockey has the Rangers and Islanders, it has the Flames and Oilers.  It has the Maple Leafs and Senators, when both teams actually put a good product on the ice.  Maybe next season.  The Maple Leafs and Sabres are also a good regional matchup.</p>
<p>It had the Canadiens and Nordiques, but that’s history&#8230;for now.  Detroit and Chicago are close, geographically speaking, and certainly historically, so you can add that one to the mix. </p>
<p>Boston and Hartford once had a thing goin’ on, but that was more like big brother Bruin endlessly beating up on Whale Boy.  Except for that 11-0 thumping the B’s took a long time ago at the hands (fins) of the Whalers.</p>
<p>The Hartford Whalers began life as the New England Whalers in the World Hockey Association, and they initially played out of Boston.  But that’s all dusty history now.</p>
<p>The Kings and Ducks would put on a marvellous show for hockey fans across North America.  The Freeway Faceoff Playoff Edition might even make a few front pages in Southern California.</p>
<p>The Ducks have their own modern day version of the Triple Crown Line.  The Mighty Mallards?  The Quack Attack?  Huey, Dewey, and Louie?</p>
<p>The Kings’ attack has been hampered by recent injuries, though their goaltending appears to be in better shape than the Ducks, unless Mr. Hiller can come all the way back.</p>
<p>The popular choice would probably be the Ducks in that matchup.  Especially considering how Anaheim handled L.A. during the final weekend of the regular season.  Try getting a ticket for that series.</p>
<p>The Boys from Northern California plan to have something to say about all that.  This is the first time they face the Kings in the playoffs, though there has been an All-California playoff series in the NHL before this.</p>
<p>The Sharks fell to the Ducks in six games during the first round of the 2009 playoff, the last time Anaheim has won a post-season series, having failed to make the playoffs last year.</p>
<p>Until a Kings-Ducks playoff battle finally ensues, hockey fans should be more than content with a San Jose – Los Angeles matchup.  Maybe Dionne Warwick can be coaxed into once again singing about all the stars in L.A. who are pumping gas.</p>
<p> <em>LA is a great big freeway<br />
Put a hundred down and buy a car<br />
In a week, maybe two, they’ll make you a star<br />
Weeks turn into years, how quick they pass<br />
And all the stars that never were<br />
Are parkin’ cars and pumpin’ gas</p>
<p>You can really breathe in San Jose<br />
They’ve got a lot of space<br />
There’ll be a place where I can stay<br />
I was born and raised in San Jose<br />
I’m goin’ back to find<br />
Some peace of mind in San Jose&#8230;(C) Burt Bacharach and Hal David</p>
<p></em>The East Coast might have to get ready for a series of very late nights.</p>
<p>Come To California, indeed.</p>
<p> <em>come to California<br />
come to California<br />
baby let it all hang out<br />
come to California<br />
tell us what it&#8217;s all about<br />
but watch your mind little bit<br />
&#8217;cause the future is beginning now<br />
come to California . . .<br />
but watch your mind little bit<br />
&#8217;cause you&#8217;re headed into the machine<br />
come to California . . . (C) Matthew Sweet</em><em></em></p>
<p> Mick Kern</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2011/04/golden-state-warriors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mayhem Through the Eyes of the Beholder</title>
		<link>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2011/02/mayhem-through-the-eyes-of-the-beholder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2011/02/mayhem-through-the-eyes-of-the-beholder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 06:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Live From Wayne Gretzky's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10-game suspensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Godard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Tangradi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxime Talbot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micheal Haley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york islanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL suspensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pittsburgh penguins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick DiPietro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trevor Gillies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gretzky.com/blog/?p=1023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God is on our side. Every army marches into battle thinking so.  Or at least hopes so, though sources tell me The Grand Master of All doesn’t pick sides. Regardless, it’s human nature to believe that our cause is just, our belief is right, our way is the true way. Take, for example, the Islanders-Penguins [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God is on our side.</p>
<p>Every army marches into battle thinking so.  Or at least hopes so, though sources tell me The Grand Master of All doesn’t pick sides.</p>
<p>Regardless, it’s human nature to believe that our cause is just, our belief is right, our way is the true way.</p>
<p>Take, for example, the Islanders-Penguins tilt on Friday evening.</p>
<p>There was a buzz before this matchup on the Island that didn’t have much to do with the respective talents of the two teams.</p>
<p>It had to do with the Dancing Bear side of the old shinny game.</p>
<p>How would the Islanders respond to slights, real and imagined, delivered their way by the Penguins the last time these two teams butted heads?</p>
<p>Penguins TV included the Brent Johnson-Rick DiPietro one-punch fight in its opening segment; the Islanders telecast also focused on it.</p>
<p>Hey, it was the main story line.  It would become The Main Event.</p>
<p>After building up an insurmountable 6-0 lead, the Islanders saw fit to exact some revenge for the laundry list of grudges they carried around with them.</p>
<p>About halfway through the second period, Matt Martin decided to go all Todd Bertuzzi on Maxime Talbot, and attacked the Penguin forward without provocation.</p>
<p>Well, that depends on what television broadcast you were glued to.</p>
<p>Thanks to Gamecentre on the NHL.com website, one can go back and view the events through the eyes of the Islanders, and then the Penguins broadcast crews.</p>
<p>Penguins  – Paul Steigerwald &amp; Bob Errey</p>
<p>Islanders – Howie Rose &amp; Butch Goring</p>
<p>From the Islanders viewpoint, Martin’s hit was payback for the pound of flesh Talbot exacted in the last game.  Rose and Goring applauded Martin for acting upon the age-old hockey truism of “taking a number”.</p>
<p>They lauded Martin for choosing the appropriate time to get back at Talbot.  A 6-0 lead for the Good Guys (C) was the perfect time, because the resulting instigator penalty probably would not hurt the Islanders.</p>
<p>Flip the broadcast over to the Penguins side of the battle, and things looked quite different.</p>
<p>To the Pittsburgh TV guys, there is no place in the game for what Martin did.</p>
<p>Or at least face Talbot when you attack him.</p>
<p>And in the third period, when Mr. Bridgeport, Micheal Haley, found it necessary to get back at Brent Johnson for his one punch knockout of Rick DiPietro, the Human Injury Machine, (even though DiPietro WANTED to fight), Eric Godard jumped off the bench to come to his goaltender’s rescue.  A big no-no, though he’ll be a hockey hero in the Pittsburgh dressing room for his mad dash.</p>
<p>Both the Islanders and the Penguins broadcasters shared similar sentiments about that one.</p>
<p>Rightfully so, Godard was slapped with a 10-game suspension.  Hopefully the league makes him serve the entire sentence.</p>
<p>Just before that happened, Howie Rose quickly apologized for initially saying that Eric Tangradi “turtled” when Trevor Gillies went at him. </p>
<p>Tangradi appeared hurt on the hit from Gillies, who showed his worth to Mankind by dropping his gloves and banging away at the injured Tangradi, who was certainly not turtling.</p>
<p>For his contribution to the great game of hockey, Gillies was suspended for nine games.  Martin got four games for his earlier sucker punch on Talbot.  Not that these suspensions will hurt the Islanders all that much; how much of an NHL future did a player like Gillies have anyhow?</p>
<p>What does hurt is a significant monetary fine.</p>
<p>The Islanders were fined $100,000 for their inability to control their dogs.  Geesh, that’s about three games worth of gate receipts for the team.</p>
<p>By the time another gathering of the clan happened near the end of the third period, the arena crew were playing “Rough Boys” by Pete Townshend, a song released in 1980.  Which was a great season for the Philadelphia Flyers.  A fitting choice.</p>
<p>What a shame Matt Cooke missed all the fun.</p>
<p>The Islanders’ TV crew were almost boastful about how the Islanders went after Talbot. </p>
<p>Know your audience.  They did.</p>
<p>For the most part, Rose and Goring sounded like they were enjoying the freak show, continually pointing out that the crowd was eating this stuff up, though they later admitted things were getting “silly” when the fighting persisted with mere minutes remaining in the game.</p>
<p>Butch Goring went on about how the Islanders will grow as a team because of the events  in that game.  Sadly, he’s probably correct.</p>
<p>Steigerwald and Errey kept saying “this is ridiculous”, and asking “when is enough enough”?</p>
<p>Any guess which of these teams is playing better hockey this season?  Which team fills its arena by playing actual hockey?</p>
<p>Without much doubt, if you substitute any two NHL teams for the Islanders, and Penguins, and have a similar scenario unfold, the TV broadcasters (and radio…and print media…and bloggers, especially bloggers) would interpret event according to their home-team bias.</p>
<p>It’s rare when a home broadcaster calls a game as objectively as possible.  After all, they understand they are mostly broadcasting to fans of the home team.  Not all that long ago, before the widespread use of the internet, and services such as NHL Centre Ice, only the home fans saw the home TV broadcast.</p>
<p>It was different for terrestrial radio, if you were lucky and the signals were clear that night.</p>
<p>Back in early 1985, a friend and I spent a pleasant clear winter night in Ottawa listening to Dick Irvin Jr. do a broadcast of the Montreal Canadiens in Landover, taking on the Washington Capitals.</p>
<p>The Habs games were carried on CKBY, the local FM country station.</p>
<p>Using a second radio, we chanced upon the Washington broadcast of the game.  For the most part, the signal from down South was consistent.</p>
<p>It was fascinating to compare and contrast the two calls.</p>
<p>While deeply immersed in the Canadiens’ culture for decades, Irvin was an old pro who had earned more than enough respect that he could call out Montreal when they didn’t play well, or when they got lucky, or when they got away with something.  His relative lack-of-bias must have had something to do with the fact his Hockey Hall-of-Fame father used to coach the Maple Leafs, and Black Hawks.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the radio play-by-play voice for the Capitals was all Caps.  He knew his constituency.  They were, generally speaking, probably relatively new to the game, and probably were Caps fans first, then hockey fans.</p>
<p>The Capitals could do no wrong, and when they did, it was invariably the fault of the officials.</p>
<p>Of course, cheering for Montreal, I heard things differently than others, but my friend, a die-hard Boston Bruins fans, in no hurry to find common ground with a Habs fan, agreed with my take on things.</p>
<p>I recall Washington won the game.  They often did after the Rod Langway trade earlier that decade.</p>
<p>A quick look at <em>flyershistory.com</em> reveals that the Capitals and Canadiens met in Montreal on December 20<sup>th</sup>, 1984, and that one ended in a 2-2 tie.</p>
<p>Was that the game we listened to?</p>
<p>It seems more likely we listened to the back end of a home-and-home series in late March.</p>
<p>On March 21<sup>st</sup>, the home town Canadiens downed Washington 3-2.</p>
<p>A night later, the home town Capitals returned the favour, beating Montreal 3-1, and yes, Rod Langway scored what proved to be the winning goal.</p>
<p>There were ten major penalties handed out in the game, five to each side.</p>
<p>Yup, this had to have been the game.  Soetart against Jensen.</p>
<p>Would love to see the video for that one, after all these years.</p>
<p>To see what really happened.</p>
<p> - Mick Kern</p>
<p><!--<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" 			xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 			xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://nhlhomeice.com/2011/02/13/rough-boys/"     dc:identifier="http://nhlhomeice.com/2011/02/13/rough-boys/"     dc:title="Rough Boys"     trackback:ping="http://nhlhomeice.com/2011/02/13/rough-boys/trackback/" /> </rdf:RDF>&#8211;></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2011/02/mayhem-through-the-eyes-of-the-beholder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OF ICE AND THEN</title>
		<link>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/12/of-ice-and-then/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/12/of-ice-and-then/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 04:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Live From Wayne Gretzky's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2003 Heritage Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first indoor hockey game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plus 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skyway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Albert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria Arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waydowntown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter classic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gretzky.com/blog/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be easy to be amused at all the fuss and furor over the Monday Night NFL matchup that was held in cold, snowy TCF Bank Stadium at the University of Minnesota, but there is that little thing known as the Winter Classic that the hockey world goes all ga-ga over. Due to snow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be easy to be amused at all the fuss and furor over the Monday Night NFL matchup that was held in cold, snowy TCF Bank Stadium at the University of Minnesota, but there is that little thing known as the Winter Classic that the hockey world goes all ga-ga over.</p>
<p>Due to snow buildup on top of the Metrodome, and the subsequent collapse of the inflated roof, the Vikings and Bears moved their Monday nighter outside onto the frozen tundra of Minnesota, the day before the official start of winter.</p>
<p>Fans of the Green Bay Packers, the Buffalo Bills, and most of the teams in the Canadian Football League, probably yawned when told of the adversity the Vikings and their fans would have to face.  The irony is a football team based in the state of Minnesota is now considered a warm weather team, due to the comfy embrace of the Dome.</p>
<p>If anything, an outdoor Vikings game every so often in late December is akin to a skinny dip in the lake on New Year’s Day; crazy yet invigorating, a reminder of whence we came.  Maybe this will become the NFL’s Winter Classic.  Maybe they’ll move the game to New Year’s Day.</p>
<p>We have become disconnected from the outside world.  Heading to work this evening, I was able to almost completely avoid having to step outside into a frosty Toronto night.  Most northern cities have a series of underground walkways, and Skyways, and Plus 15’s, that almost completely shelter the commuter/consumer from the elements.  Shades of the film waydowntown.</p>
<p>The roots of sports such as hockey and football are in the great outdoors.  Even though life was shorter and tougher circa the 1870’s, your great grandfather and great grandmother did not enjoy sitting outside in the frigid cold, watching their sarsaparilla turn to ice.  Almost from the start of organized hockey, there were calls for a covered arena.</p>
<p>If only to keep the snow off the ice; most of the early covered arenas were rather chilly.  Which is why the wave was invented by one Mr. George Zachariah Smith, a resident of Saskatoon, during a late November game in 1873.  Fans sitting next to Crazy George Zee mistook his repeated attempts to stand up as a cue to partake in the latest mania sweeping this exciting new sport called ice hockey.</p>
<p>It’s generally accepted that the first indoor hockey game took place March 3<sup>rd</sup>, 1875 in Montreal.  The Victoria Skating Rink was the site of this monumental occasion, though the game was almost delayed for a couple of days because of a conflict with a touring Dora on Ice show.</p>
<p>Much was made of the new surroundings, particularly the paring of the rosters down to nine players aside.  Afterwards, open line telegraph shows were flooded with complaints about the Americanization of the game, and there were calls for an outdoor game to celebrate the roots of hockey.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, hockey developed into an indoor game, which makes it even more difficult to understand why the coaches of the 1972-73 Medical Centre Monarchs of the St. Albert (Alberta) Hockey League still insisted on holding half of our practices on the outdoor rink at the top of Seven Hills, and the occasional 8 am January Saturday morning hockey game at the very same very much not indoor arena. </p>
<p>During that chilly childhood in Northern Alberta, it came to our attention that the Civic Arena in Pittsburgh had a retractable roof.  We all thought it would be super cool for the Penguins to live up to their name and play a game under the stars during the winter.  This obviously never came to pass, not counting that crappy Jean-Claude Van Damme movie.</p>
<p>Talk about a missed marketing opportunity, particularly during those dark days when Doug Shedden was leading the team in scoring.</p>
<p>When the taxpayers of the Province of Ontario were paying through the nose to build the SkyDome during the late 1980’s, a baseball/football stadium that was going to feature a retractable roof that would actually be used, many called for the Toronto Maple Leafs to hold a game in the concrete convertible, with the roof rolled back.</p>
<p>This was years before the advent of the Winter Classic, even before the first NHL modern era outdoor game between the Oilers and Canadiens in frigid Edmonton in November of 2003.</p>
<p>Except even that wasn’t the first modern NHL outdoor game.  There was that insane attempt in 1991 to play an outdoor exhibition game outside in Las Vegas, of all places.</p>
<p>Look, everyone knows NHL exhibition games are dogs; they really only exist to pad the pockets of the owners.  Still, whose bright idea was it to play outside in Vegas, in September.  In a parking lot.  Rangers versus Kings.  Rangers and Kings versus bugs.</p>
<p>With the ever improving technology behind ice-less ice, in the not-so-distant future the NHL will finally be able to stage the outdoor Winter Classic that hockey fans really want to see, the Florida Panthers at the Tampa Bay Lightning.  Cold weather will no longer be an issue.</p>
<p>George Zachariah Smith would have loved it.</p>
<p>- Mick Kern</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/12/of-ice-and-then/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/11/936/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/11/936/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 04:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Live From Wayne Gretzky's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1967 Toronto Maple Leafs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hall of Fame Stanley Cups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey Hall-of-game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential Hall-of-Famers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gretzky.com/blog/?p=936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q: How Many Hall-of-Famers does it take to win the Stanley Cup? The answer appears to be approximately 4.8 players. Using the Great Expansion of 1967 as our dividing line, there have been 42 Cup champions.  Of those 42 teams, only the last six champs have not boasted a current Hall-of-Famer in the lineup, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Q: How Many Hall-of-Famers does it take to win the Stanley Cup?</strong></p>
<p>The answer appears to be approximately 4.8 players.</p>
<p>Using the Great Expansion of 1967 as our dividing line, there have been 42 Cup champions.  Of those 42 teams, only the last six champs have not boasted a current Hall-of-Famer in the lineup, and that only makes sense, as a player has to be retired for three seasons before they can be inducted into the Hall.</p>
<p>So let’s subtract those six teams, and just consider all the Cup winning teams from 1967-68 up until 2002-03.</p>
<p>All of those 36 Cup champions featured at least one future Hall-of-Famer in their lineup, 176 Hall-of Famers in all.  These totals include, for instance, counting Bryan Trottier six different times, four for his tenure with the Islanders, and two Cups with the Penguins.</p>
<p>As time moves forward, this number will change. </p>
<p>For instance, defenceman Chris Chelios got into seven games with the Atlanta Thrashers last season, and it finally appears as if his NHL career is over, though recently there was talk of him going over to the KHL.</p>
<p>If he were to visit Russia, then that would only delay the inevitable, his enshrinement in the Hockey Hall of Fame.</p>
<p>When that day finally dawns, the number of Hall-of-Famer who played for the 1985-86 Canadiens, the 2001-02 Red Wings, and the 007-08 Red Wings will increase by exactly one.</p>
<p>This master list not complete, nor will it ever be.  Consider the case of Dick Duff.</p>
<p>The native of Kirkland Lake, Ontario played in the NHL from 1954 until 1972, winning six Stanley Cups, and compiling 572 points in 1030 regular-season games.</p>
<p>Thirty-four years after stepping off the ice for the final time, Duff was part of the 2006 Hockey Hall-of-Game class, one that was led by goaltender Patrick Roy.</p>
<p>There was considerable discussion that day whether or not Duff deserved to be there.  That is an argument for another day; what his induction illustrates is that a good player from the past is never truly out-of-the HOF picture.  There is hope for the Rogie Vachon’s and Kevin Lowe’s of the game.</p>
<p>Taking a glance at the list, there’s no doubt the likes of Jaromir Jagr, Nicklas Lidstrom, Dominik Hasek, Scott Niedermayer, and Joe Sakic will be first ballot Hall of Famers.  They are listed, along with more marginal candidates, as possible Hall-of-Famers, though we all know the names listed above are pretty much guaranteed to be enshrined in the near future.</p>
<p>As for the other names in that category, consider this.  Who knew that a young Steve Shutt, he of eight goals in his rookie season, would one day be in the Hall?  It’s probably safe to assume that the likes of Pavel Datsyuk, Teemu Selanne, and Chris Pronger have already accomplished enough in their NHL careers to make the cut.  The same can probably be said of Sidney Crosby, after only six seasons, if one projects the next decade of his career.</p>
<p>But what about players such as Evgeni Malkin, or Dan Boyle, or Chris Osgood?</p>
<p>How about veterans such as Doug Weight, or Bill Guerin, or Mark Recchi?</p>
<p>To avoid making subjective judgments, only players already in the Hall-of-Fame are factored into the equation.</p>
<p>One thing that can be said, since the NHL expanded over forty years ago, every Stanley Cup winning team had at least one Hall-of-Famer in their lineup.</p>
<p>Considering that there were only six teams in the league for twenty-five straight years, one would most likely find a Hall-of-Famer on every one of those championship teams.</p>
<p>Keep all this in mind when your team magically makes a deep run in the playoffs.  Somewhere in that cobbled together roster, is there a future Hall-of-Famer lurking?</p>
<p>There’d better be.</p>
<p>(This list does not include coaches or general managers, only players).</p>
<p><strong>2009-10 Chicago Blackhawks           </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane, Brian Campbell, Marian Hossa</p>
<p><strong>2008-09 Pittsburgh Penguins             </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin, Bill Guerin, Sergei Gonchar,</p>
<p><strong>2007-08 Detroit Red Wings              </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Nicklas Lidstrom, Chris Chelios, Pavel Datsyuk, Dominik Hasek, Chris Osgood, Henrik Zetterberg</p>
<p><strong>2006-07 Anaheim Ducks                   </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Scott Niedermayer, Chris Pronger, Teemu Selanne, Ryan Getzlaf</p>
<p><strong>2005-06 Carolina Hurricanes                        </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> &#8211; Rod Brind’Amour, Glen Wesley, Mark Recchi, Eric Staal, Doug Weight</p>
<p><strong>2003-04 Tampa Bay Lightning          </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> &#8211; Dave Andreychuk, Vincent Lecavalier, Martin St. Louis, Brad Richards, Dan Boyle</p>
<p><strong>2002-03 New Jersey Devils</strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hall-of-Famer</span>: Scott Stevens  (1)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> &#8211; Martin Brodeur, Scott Niedermayer, Joe Nieuwendyk,         </p>
<p><strong>2001-02 Detroit Red Wings</strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hall-of-Famers</span>: Steve Yzerman, Brett Hull, Luc Robitaille, Igor Larionov (4)                </p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Nicklas Lidstrom, Chris Chelios, Pavel Datsyuk, Dominik Hasek, Sergei Fedorov, Brendan Shanahan </p>
<p><strong>2000-01 Colorado Avalanche                        </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Patrick Roy, Ray Bourque  (2)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Joe Sakic, Rob Blake, Peter Forsberg</p>
<p><strong>1999-2000 New Jersey Devils          </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Scott Stevens  (1)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Scott Niedermayer, Martin Brodeur, Alexander Mogilny</p>
<p><strong>1998-99 Dallas Stars                         </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Brett Hull  (1)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Mike Modano, Ed Belfour, Joe Nieuwendyk</p>
<p><strong>1997-98 Detroit Red Wings              </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Steve Yzerman, Igor Larionov, Larry Murphy, Viacheslav Fetisov  (4)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Sergei Fedorov, Nicklas Lidstrom, Chris Osgood, Brendan Shanahan</p>
<p><strong>1996-97 Detroit Red Wings              </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Steve Yzerman, Igor Larionov, Larry Murphy, Viacheslav Fetisov  (4)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Sergei Fedorov, Nicklas Lidstrom, Chris Osgood, Mike Vernon, Brendan Shanahan</p>
<p><strong>1995-96 Colorado Avalanche                        </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Patrick Roy  (1)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Joe Sakic, Peter Forsberg</p>
<p><strong>1994-95 New Jersey Devils              </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Scott Stevens  (1)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Martin Brodeur, Scott Niedermayer, Bill Guerin</p>
<p><strong>1993-94 New York Rangers              </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Mark Messier, Glenn Anderson, Brian Leetch  (3)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Mike Richter, Kevin Lowe, Steve Larmer, Alex Kovalev,</p>
<p><strong>1992-93 Montreal Canadiens                        </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Patrick Roy, Denis Savard  (2)</p>
<p><strong>1991-92 Pittsburgh Penguins             </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Mario Lemieux, Ron Francis, Bryan Trottier, Larry Murphy, Joe Mullen  (5)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Jaromir Jagr, Tom Barrasso, Rich Tocchet</p>
<p><strong>1990-91 Pittsburgh Penguins             </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Mario Lemieux, Ron Francis, Bryan Trottier, Larry Murphy, Joe Mullen, Paul Coffey  (6)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Jaromir Jagr, Tom Barrasso, Rich Tocchet, Mark Recchi</p>
<p><strong>1989-90 Edmonton Oilers                  </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Mark Messier, Jari Kurri, Glenn Anderson, Grant Fuhr  (4)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’er</span> – Kevin Lowe</p>
<p><strong>1988-89 Calgary Flames                    </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Lanny MacDonald, Al MacInnis, Joe Mullen  (3)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’s</span> – Mike Vernon, Gary Roberts, Theoren Fleury, Joe Nieuwendyk, Doug Gilmour</p>
<p><strong>1987-88 Edmonton Oilers                  </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Wayne Gretzky, Mark Messier, Jari Kurri, Glenn Anderson, Grant Fuhr  (5)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’er</span> – Kevin Lowe</p>
<p><strong>1986-87 Edmonton Oilers                  </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Wayne Gretzky, Mark Messier, Jari Kurri, Glenn Anderson, Grant Fuhr  (5)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’er</span> – Kevin Lowe</p>
<p><strong>1985- 86 Montreal Canadiens                       </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Patrick Roy, Larry Robinson, Bob Gainey  (3)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’er</span> – Chris Chelios</p>
<p><strong>1984-85 Edmonton Oilers                  </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Wayne Gretzky, Mark Messier, Jari Kurri, Glenn Anderson, Grant Fuhr, Paul Coffey  (6)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’er</span> – Kevin Lowe</p>
<p><strong>1983-84 Edmonton Oilers                  </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Wayne Gretzky, Mark Messier, Jari Kurri, Glenn Anderson, Grant Fuhr, Paul Coffey  (6)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’er</span> – Kevin Lowe</p>
<p><strong>1982-83 New York Islanders             </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Bryan Trottier, Mike Bossy, Denis Potvin, Billy Smith, Clark Gillies  (5)</p>
<p><strong>1981-82 New York Islanders             </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Bryan Trottier, Mike Bossy, Denis Potvin, Billy Smith, Clark Gillies  (5)</p>
<p><strong>1980-81 New York Islanders             </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Bryan Trottier, Mike Bossy, Denis Potvin, Billy Smith, Clark Gillies  (5)</p>
<p><strong>1979-80 New York Islanders             </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Bryan Trottier, Mike Bossy, Denis Potvin, Billy Smith, Clark Gillies  (5)</p>
<p><strong>1978-79 Montreal Canadiens                        </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Ken Dryden, Guy Lafleur, Yvan Cournoyer, Bob Gainey, Larry Robinson, Serge Savard, Guy Lapointe, Steve Shutt, Jacques Lemaire, Rod Langway  <strong>(10)</strong></p>
<p><strong>1977-78 Montreal Canadiens                        </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Ken Dryden, Guy Lafleur, Yvan Cournoyer, Bob Gainey, Larry Robinson, Serge Savard, Guy Lapointe, Steve Shutt, Jacques Lemaire  (9)</p>
<p><strong>1976-77 Montreal Canadiens                        </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Ken Dryden, Guy Lafleur, Yvan Cournoyer, Bob Gainey, Larry Robinson, Serge Savard, Guy Lapointe, Steve Shutt, Jacques Lemaire  (9)</p>
<p><strong>1975-76 Montreal Canadiens                        </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Ken Dryden, Guy Lafleur, Yvan Cournoyer, Bob Gainey, Larry Robinson, Serge Savard, Guy Lapointe, Steve Shutt, Jacques Lemaire  (9)</p>
<p><strong>1974-75 Philadelphia Flyers              </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>:  Bernie Parent, Bobby Clarke, Bill Barber  (3)</p>
<p><strong>1973-74 Philadelphia Flyers              </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>:  Bernie Parent, Bobby Clarke, Bill Barber  (3)</p>
<p><strong>1972-73 Montreal Canadiens                        </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>:  Henri Richard, Jacques Laperriere, Ken Dryden, Yvan Cournoyer, Jacques Lemaire, Serge Savard, Guy Lapointe, Frank Mahovlich, Guy Lafleur, Larry Robinson, Steve Shutt<strong>  (11)</strong></p>
<p><strong>1971-72 Boston Bruins                      </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Bobby Orr, Phil Esposito, Johnny Bucyk, Gerry Cheevers  (4)</p>
<p><strong>1970-71 Montreal Canadiens                        </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Jean Beliveau, Henri Richard, Yvan Cournoyer, Jacques Laperriere, Guy Lapointe, Jacques Lemaire, Frank Mahovlich, Serge Savard, Ken Dryden  (9)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’er</span> – Rogie Vachon</p>
<p><strong>1969-70 Boston Bruins                      </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Bobby Orr, Phil Esposito, Johnny Bucyk, Gerry Cheevers  (4)</p>
<p><strong>1968-69 Montreal Canadiens                        </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Jean Beliveau, Henri Richard, Yvan Cournoyer, Jacques Laperriere, Guy Lapointe, Jacques Lemaire, Dick Duff, Serge Savard, Gump Worsley, Tony Esposito  <strong>(10)</strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’er</span> – Rogie Vachon</p>
<p><strong>1967-68 Montreal Canadiens                        </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: Jean Beliveau, Henri Richard, Yvan Cournoyer, Jacques Laperriere, Dick Duff, Serge Savard, Jacques Lemaire, Gump Worsley  (8)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Possible HOF’er</span> – Rogie Vachon</p>
<p>The 1972-73 edition of the Montreal Canadiens leads the way with 11 Hall-of-Famers, even though that team is often overlooked in favour of the Habs’ dynasties from the late 1950’s, or the Scotty Bowman-coached teams from the late 1970’s.</p>
<p>Montreal is loaded with Hall-of-Famers, as will be the Detroit Red Wings, when the Hall gets around to inducting players as they become eligible.  The 2001-02 Wings could end up having ten players in the Hall.</p>
<p>The 1990-91 Pittsburgh Penguins already have six players with Hall-of-Fame credentials, will certainly add a seventh in Jaromir Jagr, and Mark Recchi is making a solid case for his inclusion every time he takes to the ice.</p>
<p>Maybe not all that surprisingly, the New Jersey Devils boast the least amount of Hall worthy players.  Defenceman Scott Stevens is the only one in at the moment, but without a doubt, they are preparing a place in the Hall for goaltender Martin Brodeur, and defenceman Scott Niedermayer.  But is that it for the Devils, who effectively rode a team-first concept to three Cups?</p>
<p>The 1992-93 Canadiens only had two Hall-of-Famers, and the second, forward Denis Savard, got into the Hall mostly for his stellar play with the Chicago Black Hawks during the 1980’s.</p>
<p>That scenario is similar to the 1968-69 Canadiens, who had a plethora of legitimate Hall-of-Famers, though goaltender Tony Esposito was not one of them.</p>
<p>Make no mistake about it, Tony O is a legitimate Hall-of-Famer, but that’s for his great career in Chicago, not his rookie season in Montreal.  Nonetheless, that year would be the only time the younger Espo would win the Cup, as he was on the roster for the Stanley Cup Final, so he’s counted as part of the total, even though it’s misleading.</p>
<p>For comparison’s sake, we’ve included the last NHL team to win the Stanley Cup before the 1967 expansion changed the landscape of the game.</p>
<p>That would be the Toronto Maple Leafs, who boasted a whopping twelve Hall-of-Famers.</p>
<p>Which brings up the chief criticism of the Hall, the impression that it’s relatively easy to gain access through their pearly gates.</p>
<p>Some point out the inclusion of Bob Pulford as a prime example of the old boy’s network at work.  This might explain why so many Maple Leafs and Canadiens are in the Hall.</p>
<p>Even if one disregards Pulford, that team still had a glittering array of stars…even if most of them were greybeards by then.</p>
<p> <strong>1966-67 Toronto Maple Leafs          </strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hockey Hall-of-Famers</span>: George Armstrong, Andy Bathgate, Johnny Bower, Dave Keon, Tim Horton, Red Kelly, Frank Mahovlich, Bob Pulford, Al Arbour, Terry Sawchuk, Marcel Pronovost, Allan Stanley<strong>  (12)</strong></p>
<p>- Mick Kern<br />
<em>(if we missed a player, please advise us)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/11/936/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>20 Goals in 60 Minutes</title>
		<link>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/11/20-goals-in-60-minutes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/11/20-goals-in-60-minutes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 04:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Live From Wayne Gretzky's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1980's NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmonton Oilers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greatest games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest scoring games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jari kurri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maple Leaf Gardnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marian Stastny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miroslav Frycer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto maple leafs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wayne gretzky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gretzky.com/blog/?p=919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes when you’re watching a game, and it drags to a 3-2 conclusion, it’s easy to reach back into the past and glorify hockey as it used to be played. The trouble with such nostalgia is that we only remember the very best, and the very worst.  The highs and lows.  We tend to forget [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes when you’re watching a game, and it drags to a 3-2 conclusion, it’s easy to reach back into the past and glorify hockey as it used to be played.</p>
<p>The trouble with such nostalgia is that we only remember the very best, and the very worst.  The highs and lows.  We tend to forget the drab, everyday matters, the faceless games that ran into each other, week after week, month after month, season after season.  An uninspired mid-season Tuesday evening game is the same in any decade.</p>
<p>One part of life that appears to have gone by the wayside here in North America is the infusion of colour in the mainstream wardrobe.  Everyone now seems to wear the subdued shades of black and grey, as if we’re all in a collective state of mourning for something we’re not exactly sure about.</p>
<p>There is one aspect of the mainstream 80’s that Retro Nights get right; the parading of day-glo colours, and other wacky, over-the-top pastels that screamed at you then, and scream at you now.  Everyone did seem to dress up as an extra from the “Let’s Get Physical” video or any Culture Club offering.  There were those of us that rallied around the Johnny Cash man-in-black look, but for the most part, that approach was relegated to the shadows.</p>
<p>In the long history of hockey, there probably wasn’t an NHL team that better represented those overly colourful eighties than the Team of that Decade, the Edmonton Oilers.  They won four Stanley Cups in five seasons, and probably should have won five-in-a-row.  If Gretzky had remained in Northern Alberta, then that team could have taken seven Cups in-a-row, easily.</p>
<p>Recently on The War Room, Peter Berce and I were kicking around some great games from the past, games we would have liked to have attended.  One that leapt to mind for me was the 11-9 game between the Oilers and the Toronto Maple Leafs.</p>
<p>January 8th, 1986.  At Maple Leaf Gardens.</p>
<p>The lowly Leafs really must have put up a fight that night, scoring nine goals against the defending Stanley Cup champions.</p>
<p>Except it was the Leafs who scored the eleven goals.  They won the game 11-9.</p>
<p>That’s twenty goals in sixty minutes of play.  An average of a goal every three minutes.</p>
<p>You wouldn’t have wanted to leave your seat for popcorn in case you missed something.</p>
<p>I was at the Montreal Forum that same January evening, watching the Canadiens beat, ahh, someone.  Trouble is, over the years, I can’t recall who.  We were too busy keeping an eye on the Forum out-of-town scoreboard.  As the digits rose in that game, the hub-bub at the Forum rose in tandem.</p>
<p>To my knowledge, there had never been an NHL game where both teams scored in double digits.  Most of the crowd around me were tickled pink that the Leafs were scoring that many goals on the Oilers, a team not renowned for its defence, but a team that could easily give up five goals and still win the game.  Their offense was that explosive.</p>
<p>A check of the 1985-86 Oilers’s game-by-game record bears that out.</p>
<p>They won a total of seven games when the opposition scored at least five goals against them.  One of those barnburners was a 12-9 win at Chicago on December 11th.  At that point, the gun slinging Oilers sported a 21-5-and-4 record.</p>
<p>This team could play it all ways.  They could squeeze out a tight, defensive victory, such as a 3-2 win over the New Jersey Devils on November 23rd.</p>
<p>They could blow a team out of the arena, such as the 13-0 pasting of Wayne Gretzky’s favourite punching bag, the Vancouver Canucks, on November 8th, or a 12-3 win over the Detroit Red Wings on March 14th.</p>
<p>For a team that led the circuit with 426 goals that season (the second highest total in NHL history after the 446 by the 83-84 Oilers), those three games represented the only times they cracked double-digits in goals scored in a game.</p>
<p>Speaking of records, the 1980’s Oilers hold the top five marks for most goals scored in one NHL season.</p>
<p>That 12-9 win over the Blackhawks tied a Montreal Canadiens/Toronto St. Patrick’s game from 1920 for the most goals scored in one NHL game…not counting All-Star Games.</p>
<p>That 11-9 loss to the Leafs is tied with a 12-8 win by the Oilers over the Minnesota North Stars in January of 1984 for the second-most goals scored in one NHL game.</p>
<p>Image that happening today.  Last week, the Tampa Bay Lightning survived a 8-7 arm wrestling contest with the Philadelphia Flyers, and we got all excited about a mere 15 goals in a game.</p>
<p>Back to the 80’s.</p>
<p>During the 1985-86 season, the Toronto Maple Leafs managed to light the lamp a total of 311 times, which was only good enough for the 12th best total in the 21 team league.</p>
<p>The Oilers led the league with 119 points; the Maple Leafs were 19th with 57 points.</p>
<p>On that January night, it shouldn’t even have been close.</p>
<p>A search of the internet brings up the game summary for that contest.  Hold on, it’s gonna get busy.</p>
<p>Every time the Oilers made their way to Eastern Canada, it was a media circus.  Everyone wanted a piece of Wayne Gretzky.  Even back then, there were calls for the Great One to be moved to the Maple Leafs, or the New York Rangers, in the name of getting the NHL more exposure in the eastern-based U.S. media.</p>
<p>That night the Leaf faithful, who were probably bracing themselves for a beating, were just sitting down with their lattes when Russ Courtnall opened things up with a pair of goals, the first at the 2:40 mark of the first period, the second almost five minutes later.</p>
<p>Seven minutes into the game, the Maple Leafs had a 2-0 lead.</p>
<p>Make that 3-0, after Miroslav Frycer potted one on the power play at the 12:25 mark.</p>
<p>Old MLG must have been rocking.</p>
<p>Gretzky got the Oilers on the board at 14:03 with his 29th goal, but that would be it for the big boys, as the Maple Leafs pumped in two more goals before the end of the period.<br />
Steve Thomas and Brad Smith (Brad Smith!!!) got the goals.</p>
<p>5-1 Leafs after one. </p>
<p>Going into this game, the Oilers had won five in-a-row, and eleven of their last thirteen.  Maybe they were due for an off-night.</p>
<p>So who were the goaltenders for this epic?  The game summary shows that Andy Moog and Grant Fuhr split this one, while the Leafs went all the way with Tim Bernhardt.</p>
<p>With just under five minutes gone in the second period, the 16,282 in attendance must have been feeling pretty good.  Leave it to Wayne Gretzky to put some doubt in their minds. </p>
<p>His 30th at the 4:58 mark made it 5-2 Toronto.  All still seemed fine for the home team.</p>
<p>In game that featured twenty goals, there was about a six-and-a-half minute stretch where the red lights got to catch their breath.</p>
<p>At 11:19, Raimo Summanen scored.  And then Gretzky completed his hat-trick less than four minutes later.  C’mon, in a game with twenty goals, you knew Gretzky had to have some of them.</p>
<p>That made the score 5-4 Maple Leafs, with five minutes left to play in the second.</p>
<p>Toronto stopped the Oilers’ express with the second goal by Steve Thomas, a mere 24 seconds after the Gretzky tally.  Undaunted, Kevin McClelland responded for Edmonton just over a minute later.</p>
<p>The Oilers finally tied things up, when Paul Coffey got on the score sheet with his 18th goal of the season.</p>
<p>Toronto had blown a four-goal lead, and was going to head into the dressing room tangled up in a 6-6 tie.</p>
<p>Until Wendel Clark scored 33 seconds after Coffey tied it.</p>
<p>Toronto went to the dressing room with an improbable 7-6 lead.  Edmonton had outscored them 5-2 in that second frame, and still the Leafs led the game.</p>
<p>By the time they dropped the puck for the third period, it was probably safe to assume that nobody had left the game early.  Who could be sure what would unfold in the third?  Often these sort of games calm down by the third period.  There was no worry of that happening on this night.</p>
<p>Who knows what the Oiler’s coaching staff barked at their troops during the intermission.  Edmonton came out loaded for bear, and Jari Kurri joined the scoring parade, popping one in a mere 28 seconds into the third.  Less than a minute later, Glenn Anderson scored his 27th goal of the season, giving the Oilers their first lead of the game.</p>
<p>Image the see-saw emotions of the crowd at Maple Leaf Gardens that night.  They watched their team carve out a 5-1 lead after one period, only to fall behind 8-7 less than two minutes into the third.</p>
<p>Maybe that was the point that some of the faithful lost the faith, and beat a hasty retreat to the subway.</p>
<p>They shouldn’t have thrown in the towel so easily. </p>
<p>That would be the only time the Oilers enjoyed a lead all night, because 45 seconds after the Anderson go-ahead goal, Frycer replied with his second of the game.</p>
<p>And then he completed his hat-trick less than three minutes later, and the Leafs were on top again, 9-8.</p>
<p>But if anyone thought the run-and-gun Oilers were done, they were wrong.  Less than four minutes later…an eternity in this game…Anderson scored again for Edmonton.</p>
<p>With just over a dozen minutes left in the third, things were knotted up at nine apiece.</p>
<p>And then a strange thing happened.  The scoring slowed down considerably.  With nine goals in the first 48 minutes of the game, the Oilers ran out of bullets.</p>
<p>Miroslav Frycer entered his name into Maple Leafs’ lore when he got his fourth goal of the game at the 10:51 mark.  The Leafs had cracked the double-digit barrier for the second time that season.  They had put 10 goals past the Devils in a 10-7 goal marathon on December 4th, so they knew a little bit about these goal fests.</p>
<p>Dan Hodgson got the insurance marker at 18:42, and the Leafs held on for the 11-9 win.</p>
<p>At the Montreal Forum that night, most of the crowd around me were pulling for the upstart Leafs to upend the Oilers, though we all wanted to see Edmonton also get to double digits.</p>
<p>Considering there were twenty goals scored that game, only three of them came on the power play, Toronto with two of those.  Overall, there were only seven minor penalties called all night.</p>
<p>Jari Kurri had a great night, with a goal and five assists.  Gretzky had his usual production, getting three goals and chipping in with three assists.</p>
<p>For the Leafs, Frycer led the way with four goals.  Marian Stastny assisted on the last three Toronto goals. </p>
<p>Frycer, who defected to the Quebec Nordiques around the same time the three Stastny brothers did, had a couple of good years in Toronto.  His four goals this game represented a career high.  He scored 32 goals that season, also a career high, and retired in 1989 with 147 goals in 415 games, most of them with Toronto, but he also served time with Quebec, Detroit, and Edmonton.</p>
<p>As for shots, the Maple Leafs edged the Oilers 39-31.  Which means there were twenty goals on seventy shots.  Obviously no problem with goaltending equipment being too bulky this game.</p>
<p>Will we ever see a game like this again?  Well, probably not for a while, considering that it took 64 years between 20-goal games.  Then the league had three in short order, but<br />
that’s part of what made 1980’s hockey so invigorating.</p>
<p>The Maple Leafs were unable to build on that game, dropping ten of their next twelve games, including a 10-1 loss in St. Louis a week later.  Two night after 11-9 slugfest, the Leafs lost 9-7 in Buffalo.</p>
<p>How many goals did Toronto surrender that season?</p>
<p>386.  Only the Red Wings and Kings were more porous.</p>
<p>And that team that Montreal beat that same night at the Forum?  None other that their age-old rival, the Boston Bruins.  One would think I would have remembered being at that game, but we were all too busy scoreboard watching…in January.</p>
<p>- Mick Kern</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/11/20-goals-in-60-minutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking Back 40 Years</title>
		<link>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/09/looking-back-40-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/09/looking-back-40-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 03:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Live From Wayne Gretzky's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970-1971 70-71 NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Marchinko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dryden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gordie howe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Beliveau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynn Zimmerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nels Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL Guide and Record Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL Pension Plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gretzky.com/blog/?p=844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the continual delights of the month of September is the arrival of the National Hockey League Official Guide &#38; Record Book.  These days, I get one of these babies free as part of my job.  Don’t tell anyone, but if they didn’t give me a free copy, I’d still rush out and buy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the continual delights of the month of September is the arrival of the National Hockey League Official Guide &amp; Record Book.  These days, I get one of these babies free as part of my job.  Don’t tell anyone, but if they didn’t give me a free copy, I’d still rush out and buy one.</p>
<p>There’s something magical about leafing through a fresh copy of this book in the weeks before the NHL regular season gets underway.  At that juncture in time, what you hold in your hand is practically the entire encapsulated history of the National Hockey League.  Every goal scored, every assist, every win, every penalty shot, and every obscure record.  It’s tailor-made for bar-room arguments.</p>
<p>Back when I indeed did hang out in bar-rooms, my 1984-85 edition of the Official Guide &amp; Record Book, the one with Gretzky hoisting the Cup above his head for the first time, was faithfully carted from fine establishment to fine establishment in downtown Ottawa, as my drinking buddies and I attempted to out-stump each other with arcane trivia.</p>
<p>In those days before the Internet, such books were the only way to get the real facts, not some nonsense trivia about Frank Mahovlich that your brother-in-law made up one night at the family Sunday evening dinner.</p>
<p>I would have given all of my O-Pee-Chee 1973-74 doubles in order to have gotten my mitts on an NHL Official Guide &amp; Record Book during grade school.  Back then, one of the guaranteed ways to gain instant street cred from the other guys in the classroom was to know your NHL trivia.  Know It Cold.  Not one slip-up permitted, or the pack of jackals would be all over you.</p>
<p>Not being particularly athletically gifted, and years before music became the premier social calling card, I made it a point to memorize, no, to intimately know all the biographical information contained on the back of my hockey cards.</p>
<p>That in itself required an investment not only of time, but of money.  At 10 cents a pack, the cards were easily obtainable at almost every corner store in Edmonton.  But when you had parents who granted you an allowance of 25 cents every two weeks, at most, if you didn’t lose your focus and blow your money on comics and Pixy Stix, you could only buy five packs of cards a month.</p>
<p>Some shrewd school-yard trading moves, coupled with a timely cash infusion from the grandparents in New Brunswick, helped to supplement this habit.</p>
<p>What also helped in the pursuit of NHL knowledge was the discovery one afternoon of the Hockey Bible in the school library.</p>
<p>Sitting there tattered in the periodicals section was a weeks-old copy of The Hockey News.  This pipeline to nirvana, coupled with the O-Pee-Chee cards, provided me more than enough ammo to rule the home room roost.</p>
<p>Years later, circa 1995, I was rooting around a second-hand pop culture store in uptown Toronto, when I came across a pristine copy of the NHL Official Guide &amp; Record Book for the 1970-71 season.  For only five bucks, I walked out of the store with this pocket-novel sized time machine in my coat pocket. </p>
<p>If only I had had access to such gold back during primary school days.</p>
<p>Over the years, the guide went missing in my house, as it was buried under a landslide of contemporary Guide &amp; Record Books, and the detritus of everyday life.</p>
<p>Thanks to a winter flood that occurred a year-and-a-half ago, we were forced to completely remodel our main room in the basement.  Contained within that space was my ever-growing sports library.  Moving it book-by-book took a few hours, particularly since I would stop at every third book, and flip through the pages, reliving the 1978 Montreal Expos’ season,  thrilling again to the 1976 Grey Cup winning catch by Tony Gabriel, and re-reading the history of F1.</p>
<p>Near the back of one jumble of hockey flotsam-and-jetsam, still in fine condition all these years later, was the 1970-71 NHL Guide &amp; Record Book.</p>
<p>On the cover, <strong>Gordie Howe</strong> and <strong>Clarence Campbell</strong> are still grinning for the camera.</p>
<p>Correction, Mr. Hockey was grinning; Mr. Campbell was smiling.</p>
<p>Arguably, at that juncture in hockey history, Howe and Campbell were the two most famous/powerful men in the game.</p>
<p>Sure, wunderkind Bobby Orr’s star was in ascendency, and a young, brash lawyer named Alan Eagleson was gaining power every day, but entering what would be his 25<sup>th</sup> NHL season, Gordie Howe was a living legend, and still a force in the league.  A look at the 70-71 Guide Book backs that up.</p>
<p>The previous season, Howe put up 71 points in 76 games for the Detroit Red Wings.  That was good enough to lead the Red Wings, one point up on <strong>Frank Mahovlich</strong>, despite what your brother-in-law might have told you.</p>
<p>Those 71 points placed Howe ninth in league scoring, not bad for a 42-year-old.  Orr led the way with 120 points.</p>
<p>A deeper dive into the book takes one back forty years, to when The Big Bad Bruins had won their first Stanley Cup in twenty-nine years, and seemed poised to repeat.  A quick glance at the Montreal Canadiens’ goaltender depth chart shows <strong>Rogatien Vachon</strong>, <strong>Phil Myre</strong>, and <strong>Lorne Gump Worsley</strong>.   The only Dryden in the Guide was one <strong>David Murray Dryden</strong>, then a goaltender with the Chicago Black Hawks.</p>
<p>Actually, check that.  Dryden had played some of the previous season with Chicago, but he was entering the 70-71 campaign as a member of the newly minted Buffalo Sabres, who began play in the NHL that fall, along with the Vancouver Canucks.</p>
<p>The Sabres depth chart boasted the likes of Dryden, <strong>Roger Crozier</strong>, <strong>Gary Edwards</strong>, and<strong> Joe Daley </strong>in net.  And some dude named <strong>Norm Farr</strong>.  The Canucks went with <strong>Ed Dyke</strong>, <strong>George Gardner</strong>, <strong>Charlie Hodge</strong>, and <strong>Dunc Wilson</strong>.   Also some guys named<strong> Serge Aubrey</strong>, and <strong>Lynn Zimmerman</strong>.</p>
<p>1970-71 would be the first year for those two teams, and the last year for another living legend, <strong>Jean Beliveau</strong>.  The captain of the Montreal Canadiens had watched as the previous spring’s post-season proceeded without the Habs.  By the time they got ready to print the 71-72 Guide, Beliveau would have left the ice the same way he entered, as a winner, holding the Stanley Cup high over his head as he left the ice forever.</p>
<p>The 70-71 Guide also dedicated two full pages to the memory of <strong>Terry Sawchuk</strong>, who had passed away on May 31<sup>st</sup> of that year.  His 103 regular-season career shutouts looked untouchable.</p>
<p>Here’s some Sawchuk trivia for you, courtesy of page 98 of the Guide.  Sawchuk was the first player in professional hockey to win Rookie of the Year in three different leagues.  He was anointed top freshman in 47-48 in the United States Hockey League, 48-49 in the American Hockey League, and finally 50-51 in the NHL.  Would have loved to have pulled that fact out of my back pocket in Grade Five.</p>
<p>One of our favourite parts of the Guide &amp; Record Book during those beer-soaked evening were the lists of Career NHL Goal and Points leaders.  Back in 1984, the obvious names were near the top-of-the-list, but a quick glance at the list revealed that <strong>Dean Prentice</strong> was a better player than we had ever thought.  Actually, we had never thought about Dean Prentice.</p>
<p>As of the 70-71 season, none other than Gordie Howe was perched atop the NHL Career Points and Goals Lists.  After 24 seasons, Howe had compiled a staggering 763 goals and 1,757 points.  No-one else was even close.</p>
<p>In second place point-wise was Beliveau, over 600 points in the rear of Howe.  <strong>Alex Delvecchio</strong>, in my opinion maybe thee most underrated offensive force in NHL history, was the only other player to have broken the 1,000 point barrier as of the autumn of 1970.</p>
<p>Goal-wise, the 763 that Howe had was 219 better than the Rocket, and <strong>Maurice Richard</strong> hadn’t played in the league for a decade.  <strong>Bobby Hull</strong>, then at the height of his awesome power, was third with 510 career NHL regular-season goals.</p>
<p>No-one else was part of the 500 goal club.  Jean Beliveau was next with 482, and his subsequent 25 goals in his final season would push him over the magic line.</p>
<p>A scan of that goal list shows that <strong>Nels Stewart</strong> occupied 11<sup>th</sup> place with 324 career goals.  At one point, the Hockey Hall-of-Famer was the career NHL goal scoring leader, until The Rocket roared by him.  As we enter the 2010-11 season, Stewart has slipped down to, well, out of the Top 50.  Alex Mogilny and Denis Savard are tied for 49<sup>th</sup> place with 473 career goals.  You probably couldn’t find Stewart with a GPS.</p>
<p>Regardless of his current position, the Hockey News knows a good thing when they see it, and Stewart checked in at Number 51 in their 1998 list of the Top 100 NHL Players of All-Time.</p>
<p>Just like the contemporary Guide &amp; Record Book, the 1970-71 edition has a statistical breakdown of every NHL player, and many in the AHL, and CHL.  A random flip of pages turns up…</p>
<p><strong>Robert Larry Mickey</strong>.  Born in 1943 in Lacombe, Alberta.  Got into 21 games in 69-70 with the Montreal Canadiens.  The right winger recorded 4 goals and 4 assists.  Spent most of that season with the AHL Montreal Voyageurs.</p>
<p><strong>Randy Legge</strong>.  Born 1945 in Newmarket, Ontario.  Played 72 games with Buffalo in the AHL, putting up totals of zero goals and 18 assists.  He was a defenceman.  Oh, and had 161 penalty minutes.  That would have been good for sixth in the NHL.</p>
<p><strong>Kenneth Lorne Broderick.  </strong>Born 1942 in Toronto, Ontario.  The goaltender player for three teams in 69-70, including 6 games up with the Minnesota North Stars, posting a 4.33 goals-against-average.</p>
<p><strong>Allan Thomas Reid.</strong>  Born 1946 in Fort Erie, Ontario.  Another member of the North Stars, this towering defenceman (6’1’’ was big back then) suited up for 66 games with the Green-and-Gold, scoring one goals and chipping in with 7 assists.</p>
<p><strong>Brian Nicholas Wayne Marchinko</strong>.  Born 1948 in Weyburn, Saskatchewan.  Who???  This centre toiled with Tulsa of the CHL in 69-70, getting 8 goals and 14 assists in 59 games.  So, whatever became of the second-most famous citizen of Weyburn?  From what I could find, he got into 2 games that season with the Toronto Maple Leafs, and then 3 games with the Leafs the year after.  He was a member of the charter New York Islanders, finding the back of the net twice, and added 6 assists in 36 games. After 6 more games on the Island, Marchinko ended up bouncing around the minor leagues, including a stint with the Johnstown Jets.  For Islander fans who want to wear his jersey at a game this season, it looks like Marchinko wore number 22.  Hey, he’s even got an O-Pee-Chee rookie card in his snazzy Islanders’ uniform.  Card # 179.  Will only set you back 2 bucks to get a near-mint copy.</p>
<p>Thumbing through the section of the Guide that lists all the players in the minors, one trips across names like future St. Louis Blue <strong>Jack Egers</strong>, who led the CHL in scoring in 69-70, recording 90 points with Omaha. Also near the top of the CHL scoring parade were <strong>Ivan Boldirev</strong>, <strong>Tom Webster</strong>, <strong>Don Luce</strong>, and <strong>Gregg Sheppard.</strong></p>
<p>Leading the American Hockey League in scoring in 1969-70 was <strong>Jude Drouin</strong> of Montreal, who had 106 points in 65 games.  Also near the top of the AHL scoring studs were <strong>Guy Trottier</strong>, <strong>Guy Charron</strong>, <strong>Mike Nykoluk</strong>, and <strong>Rosaire Paiement</strong>.  In the case of Paiement, who was 16<sup>th</sup> in scoring with 68 points, he also racked up 242 penalty minutes.</p>
<p>One small entry, found on page 97 of the Guide, breaks down the NHL Players Pension Plan.  It began in 1947, as the players contributed $900 each per year, and the NHL contributed a variable amount.  A player could collect an annual pension of $90 for each year of service, payment starting at age 45, and guaranteed for at least a decade.</p>
<p>By 1969, the plan was revised.  The owners agreed to completely fund the Pension Plan, which began at age 45.  Players collected $300 each year for every season of service in the NHL, and $1,000 for each year once they reached the age of 65.</p>
<p>And you wonder why some of these guys charge for autographs?</p>
<p>The 1970-71 NHL Guide &amp; Record Book ran for 465 pages, and featured a full-coloured advertisement for Rawlings on the back cover.  “The Mark Of A Pro” goes the ad copy for Rawlings, then the official manufacturer of official NHL hockey equipment.  The inside cover had a picture of the blue and black Hockey Night in Canada logo.  That’s it.  Completely covers the front inside cover.  The inside back cover is a wonderful colour ad for United Airlines.  It features the logo pucks of all fourteen NHL teams, and has the slogan “Take a Tip from the Pros…Fly the Friendly Skies of United…The Airline of Sports Champions”.</p>
<p>There is no indication how much this jewel of a book cost back in 1970, nor do I know if it was even available to the general public.  It was edited by the great <strong>Ron Andrews</strong>, who was THEE MAN for years in terms of NHL statistics.</p>
<p>These days, I can’t squirrel away every annual edition of the NHL Guide.  There’s isn’t room to keep them all, so I hold on to a select few.  That 1984-85 Guide that is stained with beer and popcorn, the 1986-87 edition when Montreal won the Cup, a Guide with Mario Lemieux on the cover, and the 94-95 edition, after the impossible happened, and the New York Rangers won the Stanley Cup during my lifetime.</p>
<p>The 2009-10 copy, still in my filing cabinet here at work, sports Sidney Crosby on the cover.  My six-year-old will want to keep that one.  One day he’ll also want this 1970-71 Guide, a perfect, un-aged glimpse back into the mists of hockey history, back when Nels Stewart still held his rightful place with the greats.</p>
<p><em>- Mick Kern</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/09/looking-back-40-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stanley Cup Drought</title>
		<link>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/04/754/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/04/754/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 21:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live From Wayne Gretzky's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 NHL playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stanley cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Cup drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Cup finalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Cup winners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gretzky.com/blog/?p=754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KERN:  Just Win Baby?  Not in pro sports. Count on your team NOT winning the Big One.  It’s a long shot.  Sure, somebody has to win but it always seems to be the same teams.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Mick Kern appears courtesy of </em><a style="color: #000000; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" title="Live  From Wayne Gretzky's" href="../2010/restaurant/live.php" target="_self"><em>Live From Wayne Gretzky’s</em></a></p>
<p>Time keeps on ticking, ticking, ticking, as that old Steve Miller chestnut tells us.  With 30 franchises in the National Hockey League, even if every team were to take a turn winning the Stanley Cup, let’s say in alphabetical order, that would still mean a 30 year wait between Cup victories, and since that type of ultimate parity is never going to happen, then the sober fact is, most NHL fans will never see their team hoist the big mug.</p>
<p>Last season, the Pittsburgh Penguins were the champions, a season after making it to the Stanley Cup Final, and falling short to the Detroit Red Wings.  When captain Sidney Crosby accepted the Cup from NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman, it had been 17 years since the Penguins were crowned Stanley Cup Champions.</p>
<p>17 years is a long time; a generation of Pittsburgh hockey fans would have grown up never having seen Jaromir Jagr and Mario Lemieux play together.  Yet 17 years is nothing if you’re a fan of the Chicago Blackhawks or the Toronto Maple Leafs.</p>
<p>To have experienced a Stanley Cup celebration in Chicago, if you go with the thought that most childhood memories are retained beginning at the age of five, then the youngest you could be as a Blackhawks fans, and vividly recall the Cup being won, is the age of 54.</p>
<p>Chicago has not won the Cup since 1961.  In comparison, Maple Leafs fans aren’t so bad off.  Using that same measurement, the age of the youngest Toronto fan to witness, and remember, a Maple Leafs’ Stanley Cup parade would be 48, as the Leafs haven’t won it all since 1967.</p>
<p>Those are the two longest current Cup droughts in the NHL.  Still, that’s nothing on long-suffering New York Rangers fans.  When the Broadway Blueshirts won it all in 1940, back in the days of a seven-team NHL, if you had suggested that the Rangers would take another 54 years to win it again, you probably would have been laughed at.  No team could be that unfortunate, especially considering the era of the so-called Original Six began shortly after and lasted 25 years.</p>
<p>Yet, as the years wore on, even a losing appearance by the Rangers in the Cup Final was rare.  After falling to the Red Wings in 1950, it was another 22 years before Ranger fans could once again experience the agony of coming up short in the Final, when they lost in six games in 1972 to the Boston Bruins.</p>
<p>The mocking cry of 1940 rang in the ears of Rangers’ fans as the decades piled up.  In one four-year stretch, the rival expansion New York Islanders won more Stanley Cups (4) than the Rangers had won in their entire history.</p>
<p>The 1994 Cup win by the Rangers ended that 54-year drought, but hey, it’s now been 16 years, and counting.</p>
<p>The years can pile up very quickly.</p>
<p>Just ask a fan of the Boston Bruins.  When Bobby Orr flew through the air after putting the puck past Glenn Hall to end the 1970 Stanley Cup Final, putting the Bruins at the top of the hockey world, it had been a long 29 years since Boston had won it all.</p>
<p>Two years later, they repeated the feat.  Two Cups in three years.  The future looked bright.</p>
<p>The Bruins would make it back to the Big Show in 1974, 1977, 1978, 1988 and 1990.</p>
<p>In 1974, they fell to the expansion Philadelphia Flyers.  The powerhouse Montreal Canadiens bested them in 1977 and 1978 (and 1979, for that matter, for that semi-final was the de facto Stanley Cup Final).</p>
<p>Both of the Bruins’ Final appearances in the 80’s ran smack dab into the run-and-gun Edmonton Oilers, the first time with Wayne Gretzky, the second time without.</p>
<p>As we enter the 2010 NHL playoffs, the Boston Bruins have now gone 38 years without winning the Stanley Cup.  Of the Original Six teams, only fans of the Blackhawks and Maple Leafs have been waiting longer.</p>
<p>And for all those smug Montreal Canadiens fans, your team hasn’t won the Cup since 1993, which is 17 years ago.  Yes, there was that non-hockey year of 2004-05, but that applies to every team, which is why we’re calculating years here, not seasons.</p>
<p>That 17-year gap…and counting…is the longest in franchise history, with no indication that it will come to an end any time soon.</p>
<p>The previous dry period for the Habs was during the Dirty Thirties.  Montreal won the 1930-31 Cup, and then didn’t get to taste glory again until 1943-44, a very lengthy 13 years later.</p>
<p>That leaves the Detroit Red Wings as the only Original Six team with a Cup win in recent memory, that being in 2008.  The Red Wings also walked through Valley of the Shadow of Death, going from 1955 until 1997 before winning it all again.  That was a 42 year drought, which only goes to prove the Cup Curse, if there is one, can indeed be broken.</p>
<p>Then again, fans of the Los Angeles Kings, St. Louis Blues, Vancouver Canucks, Buffalo Sabres, and Washington Capitals might say whatever; at least you have a Cup.  All these long-time NHL franchises have made the Stanley Cup Final at least once, but returned home with nothing to show for it.  Which means the Kings and Blues are right behind the Blackhawks and Maple Leafs for longest current Stanley Cup droughts.</p>
<p>What is that cliché?  Just Win Baby?  Not in pro sports.  Count on your team NOT winning the Big One.  Mathematically, it’s a long shot.  Sure, somebody has to win, and the odds are much better than wasting two bucks on a lottery ticket, but it always seems to be the same teams that are either winning the Cup, or at least seriously competing for it.</p>
<p>The following list is ranked in order of NHL team’s that have had the shortest Stanley Cup winning drought.  Obviously, a team such as the Atlanta Thrashers has had a shorter dry spell than the Los Angeles Kings, or the Washington Capitals, due to only being in the league for about a decade.  <em>(** = teams that have yet to win a Stanley Cup)</em></p>
<p><strong>PITTSBURGH</strong><strong> PENGUINS</strong> – <em>3 Stanley Cups</em> (2009, 1992, 1991)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 1 (2008)</p>
<p><strong>DETROIT</strong><strong> RED WINGS</strong> – <em>11 Stanley Cups</em> (2008, 2002, 1998, 1997, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1950, 1943, 1937, 1936)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 13 (2009, 1995, 1966, 1964, 1963, 1961, 1956, 1949, 1948, 1945, 1941, 1940, 1934)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 2 years</p>
<p><strong>ANAHEIM</strong><strong> DUCKS</strong> – <em>1 Stanley Cup</em> (2007)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 1 (2003)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 3 years</p>
<p><strong>CAROLINA</strong><strong> HURRICANES</strong> – <em>1 Stanley Cup</em> (2006)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 1 (2002)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 4 years</p>
<p><strong>TAMPA</strong><strong> BAY LIGHTNING</strong> –<em> 1 Stanley Cup (</em>2004)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances &#8211; zero</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 6 years</p>
<p><strong>NEW JERSEY DEVILS</strong> – <em>3 Stanley Cups</em> (2003, 2000, 1995)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 1 (2001)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 7 years</p>
<p><strong>COLORADO</strong><strong> AVALANCHE</strong> – <em>2 Stanley Cups</em> (2001, 1996)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances &#8211; zero</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 9 years</p>
<p><strong>**COLUMBUS BLUE JACKETS</strong> – <em>zero Stanley Cups</em></p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – zero</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 9 years (since joining the NHL in 2000-01)</p>
<p><strong>**MINNESOTA WILD</strong> – <em>zero Stanley Cups</em></p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – zero</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 9 years (since joining the NHL in 2000-01)</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>**ATLANTA THRASHERS</strong> – <em>zero Stanley Cups</em></p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – zero</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 10 years (since joining the NHL in 1999-2000)</p>
<p><strong>**NASHVILLE PREDATORS</strong> – <em>zero Stanley Cups</em></p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – zero</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 11 years (since joining the NHL in 1998-99)</p>
<p><strong>DALLAS</strong><strong> STARS</strong> – <em>1 Stanley Cup </em>(1999)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 3 (2000 as Dallas, 1991 &amp; 1981 as Minnesota)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 11 years</p>
<p><strong>NEW YORK</strong><strong> RANGERS</strong> – <em>4 Stanley Cups</em> (1994, 1940, 1933, 1928)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 6 (1979, 1972, 1950, 1937, 1932, 1929)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 16 years</p>
<p><strong>**FLORIDA PANTHERS</strong> – <em>zero Stanley Cups</em></p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 1 (1996)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 16 years (since joining the NHL in 1993-94)</p>
<p><strong>MONTREAL CANADIENS</strong> – <em>23 Stanley Cups</em> (1993, 1986, 1979, 1978, 1977, 1976, 1973, 1971, 1969, 1968, 1966, 1965, 1960, 1959, 1958, 1957, 1956, 1953, 1946, 1944, 1931, 1930, 1924) &#8211; also one Cup in 1916 before the formation of the NHL</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances &#8211; 8 (1989, 1967, 1955, 1954, 1952, 1951, 1947, 1925)</p>
<p><em>note: the 1919 Stanley Cup Final between the Canadiens and Seattle was cancelled </em><em>due to the Influenza Epidemic</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 17 years</p>
<p><strong>**OTTAWA SENATORS</strong> – <em>zero Stanley Cups</em> (the previous Ottawa Senators franchise records are kept separate from this current incarnation)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final appearances – 1 (2007)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 17 years (since joining the NHL in 1992-93)</p>
<p><strong>**SAN JOSE SHARKS</strong> – <em>zero Stanley Cups</em></p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – zero</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 18 years (since joining the NHL in 1991-92)</p>
<p><strong>EDMONTON</strong><strong> OILERS</strong> – <em>5 Stanley Cups</em> (1990, 1988, 1987, 1985, 1984)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 2 (2006, 1983)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 20 years</p>
<p><strong>CALGARY</strong><strong> FLAMES</strong> – <em>1 Stanley Cup</em> (1989)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 2 (2004, 1986)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 21 years</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>NEW YORK</strong><strong> ISLANDERS</strong> – <em>4 Stanley Cups</em> (1983, 1982, 1981, 1980)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 1 (1984)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 27 years</p>
<p><strong>**PHOENIX COYOTES</strong> – <em>zero Stanley Cups</em></p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – zero</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 30 years (since joining the NHL as the Jets in 1979-80)</p>
<p><strong>**WASHINGTON CAPITALS</strong> – <em>zero Stanley Cups</em></p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 1 (1998)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 35 years (since joining the NHL in 1974-75)</p>
<p><strong>PHILADELPHIA</strong><strong> FLYERS –</strong> <em>2 Stanley Cups</em> (1975, 1974)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 5 (1997, 1987, 1985, 1980, 1976,)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 35 years</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>BOSTON</strong><strong> BRUINS</strong> &#8211; <em>5 Stanley Cups</em> (1972, 1970, 1941, 1939, 1929)<em> </em></p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances &#8211; 12 (1990, 1988, 1978, 1977, 1974, 1958, 1957, 1953, 1946, 1943, 1930, 1927)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 38 years</p>
<p><strong>**BUFFALO SABRES</strong> – <em>zero Stanley Cups</em></p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 2 (1999, 1975)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 39 years (since joining the NHL in 1970-71)</p>
<p><strong>**VANCOUVER CANUCKS</strong> – <em>zero Stanley Cups</em></p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 2 (1982, 1994)</p>
<p>Current Cup Drought – 39 years (since joining the NHL in 1970-71)</p>
<p><strong>**ST. LOUIS BLUES </strong>– <em>zero Stanley Cups</em></p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances – 3 (1968, 1969, 1970)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 42 years (since joining the NHL in 1967-68)</p>
<p><strong>**LOS ANGELES KINGS</strong> – <em>zero Stanley Cups</em></p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances &#8211; 1 (1993)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 42 years (since joining the NHL in 1967-68)</p>
<p><strong>TORONTO</strong><strong> MAPLE LEAFS</strong> – <em>13 Stanley Cups</em> (1967, 1964, 1963, 1962, 1951, 1949, 1948, 1947, 1945, 1942, 1932, 1922, 1918) – one as the St. Pats and one as the Arenas</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances &#8211; 8 (1960, 1959, 1940, 1939, 1938, 1936, 1935, 1933)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 43 years</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>CHICAGO</strong><strong> BLACKHAWKS</strong> – <em>3 Stanley Cups</em> (1961, 1938, 1934)</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Final losing appearances &#8211; 7 (1992, 1973, 1971, 1965, 1962, 1944, 1931)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Current Cup Drought</span> – 49 years</p>
<p><strong>Of the current thirty NHL franchises, seventeen have won the Stanley Cup. </strong></p>
<p>Only six teams have failed to at least advance to the Stanley Cup Final.  Four of those six franchises have joined the NHL in the past decade (Nashville, Atlanta, Minnesota, and Columbus), so their track record is not that bad…yet.</p>
<p>The biggest non-achievers in terms of the National Hockey League are the Phoenix Coyotes and the San Jose Sharks.</p>
<p>The Sharks came into being when the Gund Brothers engineered a franchise split with the Minnesota North Stars in 1991.  Despite having stellar regular season teams for the past few seasons, the Sharks have been unable to get near the Cup Final.</p>
<p>As for the Coyotes, they began life in 1972 as the Winnipeg Jets of the World Hockey Association.  The seven years they spent in that rebel league were fruitful, as they won three Avco World Trophies, and arguably, were better than a number of NHL teams at the time…Colorado Rockies, Cleveland Barons, Detroit Red Wings, etc.</p>
<p>Along with the Whalers, Nordiques, and Oilers, the Jets were absorbed into the NHL in time for the 1979-80 season.  Most of their good players were reclaimed by the existing NHL clubs, and even though the Jets iced a number of competitive teams in the mid-80’s, they have never come close to making it to the Stanley Cup Final, either in Winnipeg, or in Phoenix, where they relocated in time for the 1995-96 campaign.</p>
<p>The underlying point to all is this a blunt one; a team’s window-of-opportunity to win the Stanley Cup is a narrow one at best.  When you’re one of the top eight teams in the league, it’s probably worth it to roll the dice and do whatever you deem necessary to win it all.  If not, your Stanley Cup Drought will only drag on.</p>
<p>-  Mick Kern</p>
<p><em>(all stats as of 04-02-10  -  if any of the stats are wrong, please contact me)</em></p>
<p><em>Mick Kern appears courtesy of </em><a style="color: #000000; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" title="Live  From Wayne Gretzky's" href="../2010/restaurant/live.php" target="_self"><em>Live From Wayne Gretzky’s</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/04/754/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Life Of Colin Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/03/the-life-of-colin-campbell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/03/the-life-of-colin-campbell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Live From Wayne Gretzky's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander Ovechkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc savard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cooke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL suspensions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gretzky.com/blog/?p=743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KERN: Imagine, if you can, being Colin Campbell these days. Among your many tasks with the NHL is the job of deciding when to levy supplementary discipline for a rule infraction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">Mick Kern appears courtesy of </em><a style="color: #000000; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" title="Live From Wayne Gretzky's" href="http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/restaurant/live.php" target="_self"><em style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">Live From Wayne Gretzky’s</em></a></p>
<p>Imagine, if you can, being Colin Campbell these days.</p>
<p>Among your many tasks with the National Hockey League is the job of deciding when to levy supplementary discipline for a rule infraction.</p>
<p>Regardless of who that player is, and how heinous their on-ice crime may have been, immediately one of the thirty teams, and their fan base, and the media that covers them, will believe you to be a complete idiot.</p>
<p>If you choose to suspend that player, but only a couple of games, then the team, fans and media of the player aggrieved will also believe you to be a complete idiot.</p>
<p>If that player transcends his team, then more fans, and more media, will share that opinion.</p>
<p>As Colin Campbell, when you have had to let a number of on-ice incidents slide because of a variety of factors, then you are accused of applying a “wheel-of-justice” approach to discipline.</p>
<p>Regardless of the logic that you apply to each individual incident, your work as the league disciplinarian will be looked at as a whole, as the media and fans apply the auteur theory to your rap sheet.</p>
<p>You cannot win working under these conditions, because there is no way you’re going to come close to pleasing the majority of hockey people.</p>
<p>So, instead, you have to do what you think is right, what you think is just.</p>
<p>It doesn’t help things when you pass on slapping Matt Cooke of the Penguins on the wrist for his blind-side hit on the Bruins’ Marc Savard&#8230;and then only a week later, the league’s premier superstar, Alex Ovechkin, forces you to suspend him for a couple of games for basically a hit from behind on the Blackhawks’ Brian Campbell, on a nationally televised game between two of the league’s top teams.</p>
<p>It doesn’t help when the likes of Washington Capitals’ owner Ted Leonsis publicly muses about the Ovechkin hit, and wonders why the NHL MVP is told to sit for a couple of games, but Cooke gets nothing.  (Then again, as good an owner as Leonsis is, nothing is ever wrong with his team.  Every loss can be explained.  Ahh, newbies).</p>
<p>It doesn’t help when the chattering classes of the internet point out that your son, who plays for the Florida Panthers, will “benefit” from not having to face Ovie when they play the Capitals this week, as ridiculous a claim as there is, but some still went there   (Ahh, idiots).</p>
<p>I don’t know about other North American sports, but it’s always amazed me how hockey fans honestly believe they each know what is best for the sport.  That passion, as blind and as pig-headed as it often is, reminds me of the passion of European soccer fans.  Now, we haven’t taken to the worst excesses of that species yet, though a stroll through the myriad of team-themed on-line sites may suggest those days are inching closer.</p>
<p>Personally, I seem to disagree with Colin Campbell on roughly a third of his calls, though all things considered, I thought the league would pass on a suspension for Ovechkin; a plausible argument can be made either way.</p>
<p>I also have a theory that many in the NHL, maybe even Campbell himself, like the very rough stuff, the play that goes over the line.  No, they don’t want to see anybody seriously hurt, but a little ultra-violence never hurt the ratings now, did it?</p>
<p>What I do like about Campbell is that he sticks his chin out there after making a judgement, and stands by it.  It doesn’t appear as though he sticks his finger in the air to judge which way the wind is blowing, despite what you or I might personally believe.  The two-game suspension to Ovechkin might be an exception, but hey, we all answer to other people in whatever line of work we are in, so maybe his hand was forced.</p>
<p>Some will say that is a good thing.  Some will say idiot.</p>
<p>The life of Colin Campbell.</p>
<p>- Mick Kern</p>
<p><em style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">Mick Kern appears courtesy of </em><a style="color: #000000; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" title="Live From Wayne Gretzky's" href="http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/restaurant/live.php" target="_self"><em style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">Live From Wayne Gretzky’s</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/03/the-life-of-colin-campbell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Best Player In A Trade</title>
		<link>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/01/the-best-player-in-a-trade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/01/the-best-player-in-a-trade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Live From Wayne Gretzky's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best hockey trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brian burke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calgary Flames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cliff Fletcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dale Hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darryl Sutter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dion Phaneuf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hockey trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jarome iginla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe sakic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kent Nilsson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL swaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nhl trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Roy trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter pocklington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Pollock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto maple leafs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wayne gretzky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Gretzky trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worst hockey trades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gretzky.com/blog/?p=729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KERN: Can somebody please drive a broken composite stick through the heart of that saying every time a big trade is made? You know; the team with the best player wins. Yeah, says who?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Mick Kern appears courtesy of </em><a title="Live From Wayne Gretzky's" href="../../restaurant/live.php" target="_self"><em>Live From Wayne Gretzky’s</em></a></p>
<p>Can somebody please drive a broken composite stick through the heart of that saying that is trotted out every time a big trade is made in the National Hockey League?</p>
<p>You know the saying; whichever team ends up with the best player wins the trade.</p>
<p>Yeah, says who?</p>
<p>Sam Pollock, that’s who.  The legendary general manager of the Montreal Canadiens worked the phones at a time when it often seemed that half of his fellow GM’s in the league approached their job like it was a hobby, something they did for kicks after the dishes were done.</p>
<p>In this day-and-age, despite what the frothing fan base of a particular franchise may feel, every one of the thirty NHL general managers are top notch.  In this instantaneous over-informed society we live in, there is no way a GM not up to the job would last for any length of time.  They would very quickly be exposed.  Bob Pulford should thank his lucky stars he handled the job at a time when dinosaurs such as Bill Wirtz walked the Earth.</p>
<p>When two teams make a major trade, such as the one the Calgary Flames and Toronto Maple Leafs engineered on the last day of January, some hockey pundit somewhere will bring up that old Sam Pollock saying.</p>
<p>It’s often true; just think of the Montreal Canadiens moving disgruntled goaltender Patrick Roy (along with Mike Keane) to the newly minted Colorado Avalanche in exchange for goaltender Jocelyn Thibault, and forwards Andrei Kovalenko and Martin Rucinsky (December 6<sup>th</sup>, 1995).</p>
<p>But it’s not always the case.</p>
<p>Steve Simmons uttered the Sam Pollock phrase on “The Reporters” on TSN, citing defenceman Dion Phaneuf as the best player in the Flames/Maple Leafs deal.</p>
<p>If that is indeed correct, then why did Flames’ GM Darryl Sutter trade the best player?  Did Sutter bump his head during a weekend trip to Okotoks?</p>
<p>Of course not; Sutter appraised his team, what it needed and what could be sacrificed, all the time keeping in mind the underlying factor of the salary cap, and its often far-reaching implications.</p>
<p>Maple Leafs’ GM Brian Burke did the same thing to his team, and presto, we had a big trade to discuss.</p>
<p>On paper, or at least on a piece of paper dated January 31<sup>st</sup>, 2008, Phaneuf is without question the best player in the swap.  But that is a long two years ago.  Since then, Phaneuf has become everybody’s favourite whipping boy, and as the Flames were awash in expensive defenceman, it was pretty clear they would move the underachieving, at times selfish, rearguard.</p>
<p>Time will tell if Phaneuf is the best player in the deal.  Maybe big defenceman Keith Aulie will end up being the best player.  That’s the chance any team takes when it swaps warm bodies.</p>
<p>The Calgary Flames traded Brett Hull to the St. Louis Blues.  The young emerging sniper went on to a Hall-of-Fame career.  The Flames profited from that trade by winning the 1989 Stanley Cup.  Hull would not win a Cup in St. Louis.</p>
<p>The Golden Brett was the best player in the trade in hindsight.  Even at the time of the transaction, the Flames knew they were giving up a future superstar.  Still, who won that trade?</p>
<p>That March 7<sup>th</sup>, 1988 trade breaks down as such…Brett Hull, and Steve Bozak to the Blues for defenceman Rob Ramage and goaltender Rick Wamsley.  The Flames were upset that spring by the Edmonton Oilers (Wayne Gretzky’s final hurrah as an Oiler), but Ramage was a key part of the Redwood defence that helped the Flames win it all a year later.</p>
<p>Speaking of blockbusters, how about Gretzky going to the Los Angeles Kings during the summer of 1988?  It put hockey on the map, as the cliché goes, in many non-traditional markets in the U.S. (feel free to debate the pros and cons of that result), but the Kings never won the Stanley Cup.  They lost to Montreal in 1993, while the Oilers won the 1990 Cup, two seasons after trading The Great One.  As for Gretzky, he never won another Stanley Cup after 1988.</p>
<p>Who won that Gretzky trade?  Well, the Kings, even though they never won the Cup.  If anything, that trade was a harbinger of what the NHL would face during the 1990’s; the marginalization of small market teams and the resulting player moves necessistated by monetary concerns.</p>
<p>That August 9<sup>th</sup>, 1988 trade breaks down as such&#8230;Gretzky goes to the Kings along with Marty McSorley and Mike Krushelnyski.  To the Oilers goes Martin Gelinas, Jimmy Carson, 1<sup>st</sup> round draft picks in 1989, 1991, and 1993 and money.</p>
<p>Money, because Oilers’ owner Peter Pocklington was beginning to experience the first of his many business/legal headaches to follow.  “I’d Trade Him Again”, indeed.<strong></strong></p>
<p>Gelinas and Carson were key members of that 1990 Stanley Cup winning squad in Edmonton.</p>
<p>Even if either Phaneuf or Aulie outperforms the players sent to Southern Alberta in this latest blockbuster, when a GM makes a trade, he’s looking to improve his team, not worrying about the legacy of the trade.  If his team improves, either short-term for a playoff drive, or long-term, then the legacy issue usually takes care of itself.</p>
<p>Exhibit B about the foolhardiness of investing 100% faith in the Pollock saying also involves the Calgary Flames.</p>
<p>Flames fans were up-in-arms when Magic Kent Nilsson was traded to the Minnesota North Stars on June 15<sup>th</sup>, 1985.  Through that trade, the Flames received two draft picks, one which they used to grab Joe Nieuwendyk in the second round (27<sup>th</sup> overall) in the 1985 NHL Entry Draft.</p>
<p>When Nilsson hoisted the 1987 Stanley Cup with the hated Edmonton Oilers, many Flames’ fans decried the earlier trade, asking “Joe Who?” about Nieuwendyk, until Joe Who popped in 51 goals as a rookie in 1987-88.</p>
<p>Joe Who was part of the Flames 1989 Stanley Cup team, so when it came time for Calgary to move him along to the Dallas Stars (December 19<sup>th</sup>, 1995), they got Corey Millen, and some guy named Jarome Iginla.</p>
<p>Iginla had been the Stars 1<sup>st</sup> round draft pick in 1995, and all these years later, the captain of the Flames is a reasonable bet to make the Hockey Hall-of-Fame upon his retirement.</p>
<p>Still, some Flames’ fans grumbled about losing Joe Who to the Stars.  You’d think they’d have learned their lesson; the team that gets the “best player” in the trade doesn’t necessarily win the trade.</p>
<p>The Minnesota North Stars got Nilsson, but he won a Cup with the Oilers.  The Dallas Stars got Nieuwendyk, and he helped them win their only Cup, but they paid a heavy price in giving up Iginla.</p>
<p>Arguably, both teams won that trade.</p>
<p>Then there’s the June 13<sup>th</sup>, 1987 swap between the Quebec Nordiques and the Washington Capitals.  Dale Hunter, the heart and soul of the 1980’s Quebec Nordiques went to D.C., and coming back to Quebec was a draft choice that ended up being Joe Sakic.</p>
<p>(The actual trade was Gaeten Duchesne, Alan Haworth and a 1<sup>st</sup> round draft pick to Washington for Dale Hunter and Clint Malarchuk).</p>
<p>Perennial playoff failures, the Capitals got a shot-in-the-arm with the inclusion of Hunter on their roster, and they finally won a Game Seven in overtime when La Petite Peste scored on a breakaway against the Flyers’ Ron Hextall the following spring.</p>
<p>The Nordiques entered some very bleak years, before stockpiling high draft picks, and emerging as a young, promising team, led by Sakic.</p>
<p>Both teams can claim to have won that trade, all depending on how you view it.  The Capitals needed to change up their chemistry, and the Nords needed to rebuild.  Both succeeded thanks in large part to that trade.</p>
<p>In reality, the team that really won that trade was the Colorado Avalanche, but no-one had any inkling of that reality back when the Hunter trade was consummated.</p>
<p>A final note.  Even if Dion Phaneuf wins the Norris Trophy, the Leafs/Flames trade is not even close to being a duplicate of the January 2<sup>nd</sup>, 1992 trade that brought Doug Gilmour to Toronto, despite what the Toronto-based hockey media has been repeating over and over and over again.</p>
<p>The Flames and Maple Leafs exchanged five players each that day, with Gilmour being the prime asset.  He was a very good player with Calgary (and St. Louis before that), and thanks to a contract impasse with GM Doug Risebrough and the Flames’ brass, Gilmour was shipped out-of-town.</p>
<p>This transaction actually fits the Sam Pollock saying about which team wins a trade.</p>
<p>Even on that day, unless you were a diehard Flames fan, one could see the Leafs “won” that trade.  The inspired play of Gilmour, and the sizeable contributions of the likes of Jamie Macoun, and Ric Nattress, far out shadowed the meager contributions in Cowtown of the likes of Gary Leeman and Michel Petit.</p>
<p>I know, for I had a sprited argument with the Calgary cabbie who was dropping me off at the Calgary airport that evening, as I was returning to Toronto after spending Christmas with the family.  He was convinced that the Gilmour trade would put the Flames over the top, as they were getting 50-goal scorer Leeman.</p>
<p>Leeman would win his only Stanley Cup two seasons later as a role player with the 1993 Montreal Canadiens.  His stay in Calgary was brief and uneventful.</p>
<p>The Toronto Maple Leafs and GM Cliff Fletcher won that trade easily.  It helped revive, on-ice, that franchise, and set up the Leafs to enjoy, for the most part, a rather successful decade.  In both 1993, and 1994, the Leafs were legitimate Cup contenders.</p>
<p>That was a trade that shook up the NHL.  The current Flames/Maple Leafs trade only shakes up those two teams.</p>
<p>- Mick Kern</p>
<p><em>Mick Kern appears courtesy of </em><a title="Live From Wayne Gretzky's" href="../../restaurant/live.php" target="_self"><em>Live From Wayne Gretzky’s</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/01/the-best-player-in-a-trade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winter Classic Autopsy</title>
		<link>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/01/winter-classic-autopsy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/01/winter-classic-autopsy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Live From Wayne Gretzky's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston bruins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fenway Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey Gods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hockey in Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Recchi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL Winter Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outdoor hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philadelphia flyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter classic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gretzky.com/blog/?p=714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KERN: The Curse of the Locusts is over. Way before any of these much-hyped Winter Classic outdoor games, the NY Rangers and LA Kings faced off in the great Las Vegas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Mick Kern appears courtesy of </em><a title="Live From Wayne Gretzky's" href="../../restaurant/live.php" target="_self"><em>Live From Wayne Gretzky’s</em></a></p>
<p>The Curse of the Locusts is over.</p>
<p>Way before any of these much-hyped Winter Classic outdoor NHL games, the New York Rangers and Los Angeles Kings faced off in the great outdoors for an exhibition match in September of 1991.</p>
<p>The game was held outside of Caesar’s Palace in Las Vegas, and at one point, they had to stop things to deal with an infestation of locusts, as if the Hockey Gods were signalling their displeasure with how Their Game had be reduced to a Vegas sideshow&#8230;and the coming expansion of the NHL into the Sun Belt.</p>
<p>With the Boston Bruins’ 2-1 overtime win over the Philadelphia Flyers at the snowy confines of Fenway Park, we finally have a notch under the win column for the home team.</p>
<p>The way things were going, the home town had to accept the inevitability of a defeat in exchange for the privilege of hosting the gala affair.</p>
<p>Maybe the Hockey Gods finally approve.</p>
<p>In November of 2003, in bitter cold weather, the Montreal Canadiens upended the hometown Edmonton Oilers 4-3 in the Heritage Classic.</p>
<p>Two years ago, during the first Winter Classic, held in the snow globe commonly known as Ralph Wilson Stadium, the Pittsburgh Penguins edged the hometown Buffalo Sabres 2-1 in a shootout.</p>
<p>Last year, the defending Stanley Cup champion Detroit Red Wings defeated the hometown Chicago Blackhawks 6-4 at Wrigley Field.</p>
<p>Of course, back during the dawn of professional hockey, they played outdoors on a regular basis, though that feels like two centuries ago, so that doesn’t count.</p>
<p>As for Winter Classic Mark III, I think this proves that actual goals are important in hockey.</p>
<p>Yes, I can hear the old fogies now, and I was once in lockstep with them.  A good game is not contingent on the number of goals, it’s the number of chances and the overall flow of the game.</p>
<p>To those points, I still agree, though I think both are trumped by the actual scoring of goals.</p>
<p>For it’s when they light the lamp that the crowd really gets into the game.  Sure, a good body check, or a great save, or even a fight, will all elicit excited responses from the crowd, but the goal of the game is still, well, goals.  Score more than the other guys.</p>
<p>The ice conditions at Fenway were as probably favourable as they’ll ever be for one of these outside dances, meaning both the Flyers and Bruins were able to play a game resembling an everyday  NHL contest, albeit with the heating broken and some wind to contend with.</p>
<p>Though maybe that’s the problem, the fact they could play a reasonable facsimile of an indoor NHL game; maybe that speaks more of a continuing tightening of defensive systems and the resulting anti-surfeit of scoring in the league.</p>
<p>The Flyers held a 1-0 lead for a sizeable portion of the game, and though the quality of play was arguably superior to that in Edmonton and Buffalo, there was an underlying feeling the game hadn’t nearly reached its entertainment potential; well, that was the sentiment in my basement.</p>
<p>Early on, Shawn Thornton and Daniel Carcillo exchanged late Christmas cards to each other’s face, which instantly made them the answers to a trivia question.  The bout in unto itself was not particularly noteworthy, so the game was still searching for its signature moment.</p>
<p>There were a couple of breakaway chances that Tim Thomas turned aside, and you could go a number of games during any given week in the NHL and not see a guy sprung free, so that was nice.</p>
<p>But the game needed a goal, if possible, a big goal.</p>
<p>The Flyers scored first, thanks mainly to Thomas deciding to go all Ron Hextall on Scott Hartnell just as a point shot was threading its way into the back of his net.</p>
<p>The reigning Vezina Trophy winner more than made up for that gaffe, providing visual evidence why U.S.A. Olympic Team general manager Brian Burke made him one of three goaltenders on the American hockey squad for Vancouver.</p>
<p>Still, this game came to life when old pro Mark Recchi scored to tie it with 2:18 left in the third period.</p>
<p>That’s when the game came to resemble an NBA game.  You know, you only watch a basketball game for the last two minutes.</p>
<p>The offensive thrusts into the zones were numerous, and both teams created scoring chances, if only from the hurried nature of those last 120 seconds.</p>
<p>Naturally, the game went into extra innings, and the home team got the extra point, and as importantly, the extra style point, for winning it, sending the Bleacher Bums home happy.</p>
<p>If the game had ended 1-0 Flyers, much of the talk would have been about Tim Thomas, and how he let his mask slip, and a goal resulted as a result.  If that score had stood, I would have nominated him First Star for creating the best offensive chance of the game.</p>
<p>Thankfully, this was not to be the case, and the 2010 edition of the Winter Classic will probably go down in most people’s books as indeed a classic.</p>
<p>It wasn’t.</p>
<p>It was a good game, not a great game.  Like most good games, it had moments, though those moments only served to whet the appetite for more such moments.</p>
<p>The build-up to the game was nicely handled, as were those TV commercials with Alex Ovechkin and his Caps’ taking on the Flyers on the frozen tarmac of what appeared to be Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in Arlington.  Now that would be a Winter Classic.   Best goal of the day was Ovechkin’s shot into the bulldozer.</p>
<p>After a couple of hours of reflection, I still think the NHL should keep to one Outdoor Classic a year.  Yes, the Canadian franchises want to share in the fun, and yes, NBC wants two American teams participating on TV.  Which means as it stands now, the six Canadian teams won’t get invited to the party.</p>
<p>And that’s how it should be.  Despite all the overwrought prose about kids playing hockey outdoors, this game is one big novelty.  A little sugar with the medicine for all those non-hockey fans who are sitting on the couch on New Year’s Day.  It’s tailor-made for the sports tourists, who can gasp at all the pretty pictures from the blimp.</p>
<p>This is one thing NHL that should remain south-of-the-border.  It won’t.  There will be two Winter Classics a season very soon.  Which will take away somewhat from the feeling of being or watching a special event.</p>
<p>Be the first on your block to own the latest toy, before all the nerdy kids get one too!</p>
<p>The Hockey Gods may look down and yawn.</p>
<p>As long as they don’t send the damned locusts again.</p>
<p>- Mick Kern</p>
<p><em>Mick Kern appears courtesy of </em><a title="Live From Wayne Gretzky's" href="../../restaurant/live.php" target="_self"><em>Live From Wayne Gretzky’s</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gretzky.com/blog/2010/01/winter-classic-autopsy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

